
10 April 2019 | 25 replies
If you are risk adverse real estate, (especially out of state) is not for you.

23 June 2020 | 37 replies
Well, they can include things like illiquidity of the investment, an unexpected vacancy, interest rate risk, adverse tax consequences, and long-term hold periods, to name but a few.

3 March 2021 | 14 replies
Two scenarios:1) Risk Mgmt/Adverse: Assuming you are a high income earner and do not need the cash, I would buy another out of state property since it’s cheaper vs CA via conventional method, then take 1k and pay down debt and pay off property, then snowball pay out the other new investments 2) Aggressive/Growth: Agree with other folks.

9 September 2017 | 40 replies
There are buyers out there who are 100% adverse to having to put any work into something, and many will skip from the photos alone.

8 July 2020 | 8 replies
Some people are already wealthy and risk adverse so take less yield for more perceived security to cash flow and the investment.That is why I say again to DEFINE YOUR GOALS versus reacting to what people are trying to sell you on with what they do.

30 July 2020 | 17 replies
A benefit to this is I will not have to issue an adverse action letter if I find something untoward prior to running the report, not to mention saving that cost.)

4 December 2018 | 24 replies
If you are risk adverse real estate, (especially out of state) is not for you.

16 September 2019 | 27 replies
If you are risk adverse real estate, (especially out of state) is not for you.

9 June 2019 | 5 replies
If you are risk adverse real estate, (especially out of state) is not for you.