Most discussions with landlords I've seen indicate an intent to make appropriate business and ethical decisions to treat these people fairly and share the burden.

You may need to do monthly treatments for a year in some cases.

While I came from very modest means I was also blessed to be taught to have a strong work ethic that has served me well. 

The problem is, what "analyze" means is defined exactly nowhere, and the provision is located within USPAP under a standard that deals specifically with the development of value, not reporting, not ethics, not record keeping, not scope of work, etc.

I am thinking this will be a fair way to give more relief to the better longer term tenants, and does not require me to have one to one  conversations, reviewing evident of hardship, and making case by case decisions that may come back to me as being unfair treatments and playing favorites.To me using the last month's rent plus a rent credit may be something that can hold people over several months plus it's an incentive for longer term tenants (which are typically better tenants) to stay longer.

If that were to happen many trillions would be lost around the world and when there is that much $$$ involved, believe me there would be an effective treatment or vaccine found before that.

They treat it and do follow up treatments every two weeks.

If you want to do it without the seller knowing, I would challenge the ethics of that strategy.

Ethics are also a part of this business.

@Joel Owens, @Jay Hinrichs, @Russell Brazil - As I listen to you guys talk about your expectations/ethics as service providers, I can't help but think about how it seems like "the art of the relationship" is a dying sentiment in the brokerage world.