I can't come up with a rational explanation for that position, but maybe you can clarify.It should be self evident that a buyer's agent will decide which properties that he or she recommends to a buyer. 

If you have a rational end buyer is like @Guy Raveh then just do an assignment fee.  

One on the buy side (low price, crappy commission) and again on the sell side (all fixed up, much higher commission).You guys sound like a street level drug dealer trying to rationalize selling heroin. 

Any pro-ration (if applicable) is for the second month. 

Prices on the coasts do not track any rational family income to purchase price model. 

Its the best way to invest in a rational (non emotional) way.

Her rational is that she is not comfortable about showing the property without knowing much about the candidates. 

They put a Black face out front, and this person believes or rationalizes she/he is helping keep the neighborhood from being gentrified, or giving a chance for lower income families to live in a nicer area. 

Part of me wants to just pay off the loans to open up the 1500/mo which reduces our liabilities and in turn would allow us to save more cash and reduce out debt/income ration.

Now that I own around 100 units and bringing a million a year in rents, I wonder if hiring a full time employee to help me manage my own units would be a good or bad idea.The rational is since I am paying around $70K a year I management commission, I could hire a small team to help me manage my units more efficiently.Has anyone done this?