I'd look at the closing docs for something related to the pro-ration of expenses etc and see if you have anything there that could be a clause you point to for them to cover those payments. 

The more rational you are, the better the outcome.Practice and LearnLike any skill, negotiation improves with practice.

Any rational landlord will double or triple their screening efforts because nobody wants to accidentally put a deadbeat in their property. 

So, to casually mention eviction before investigating how this might be resolved in a positive way would shock any rational person. 3.

Is there room to reprice water so it’s rational such that the heaviest users pay the highest rates vs today where the lightest users do, particularly in areas like CA?

Our tools are a reflection of our ability to rationalize...This, in turn, is where the competitive advantage is.Think about it.

Pent up  demand is a farce, you want to rationalize what is legitimate demand. 

Thank you for the rational and well-thought-out input!

Its a tough subject because logically, they are joint and several guarantys so rationally a 100% guaranty from each of two people (one 740 one 680 for example) is ALWAYS going to be better than just one 100% guaranty from someone at 740 (so it wouldn't make sense to have a better rate for the latter)The problem is that there is fraud and "straw borrowers" out there where someone who is not involved in the property signs on to boost score and terms - so many DSCR Lenders in response either do the "non-rational" thing and price to the lower to avoid the fraud or use the higher of the two (and either be a little loose with things or just stay vigilant on any funny business)

Maybe not (sometimes) rational, but FUN nevertheless.