
18 June 2016 | 7 replies
*If Tesla can open up every one of their patents for public use, pretty sure someone can do the same with a few documents.

30 September 2016 | 50 replies
Maybe you could come to an agreement with the Seller regarding having first option to buy sub-to, and suggest asking if the Seller would agree with asking someone like Linda Thomas (or other Erin Brockovich type) to poke a stick at the County arguing conflict-of-interest or patently unfair practices or some such?

19 February 2016 | 5 replies
The membership marks (and trade and service marks) are registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office.

19 February 2016 | 1 reply
Before you just patently say this is s bad idea, remember my entire state is a former swamp and most of us are very close to sea level here.

14 March 2016 | 13 replies
Only downside would be that as a broker I must disclose what I know about latent and patent defects of any property.

15 April 2016 | 8 replies
Right now patent or patience it hard to start; WAIT WAIT SOON WILL COMING !!

25 February 2017 | 6 replies
Let's put an end to this. https://www.change.org/p/u-s-patent-trademark-office-cancel-registered-trademark-we-buy-houses

5 October 2019 | 3 replies
It needs to change.http://www.austintexas.gov/department/land-development-code-draftsWE are working on a patent pending software app to Identify hidden lots of record. and reading this quickly It looks like the city is exempting older lots of record.. this software is going to make some Austin builders and investors some major money..