This made somewhat of a visual impact that draws the viewer to that highlight, and it reduces the likelihood of that post being skimmed over.

I stopped my ads and changed around my website to let viewers know what was really going on.

http://images.craigslist.org/3nb3m53l85Y15P05S3b84b056bad275f61ef6.jpg

LOL!

was to attract the younger viewer who did not care about P/E ratios and sound financial data.

Another that is a two bedroom house with a detached garage, 932 sq. ft. sold in Oct. 2007 for $71,000.00.I am including copies of the “Lucas County GIS Viewer Parcel Report†of all of the above described properties.

So, I spent about a quarter page listing 8 obvious lies he's told his viewers/listeners.

I pick on Fox News because the viewers tend to be the most indoctrinated, but in reality, all American news is partisan and bulls*** in my opinion.

Originally posted by Tom Cullen: If you were an unbiased viewer looking to be informed...If I were an unbiased viewer, first and foremost I'd be looking for the station that didn't *REPEATEDLY* mess up the simplest of facts, like which politician belonged to which party (of course, only during a crisis, and only when it made the Dems look bad when it was actually the Republicans who were embarrassed):http://intershame.com/on/Fox_News/I'll ask the obvious question here (that will no doubt be ignored by the Fox News supporters because they know there is no reasonable explanation): Were all these mistakes intentional (which clearly indicates bias) or were all these mistakes accidental (which clearly indicates ineptitude)?

Fox-Jazeera does that a lot too...probably works on many of their viewers, actually...

"Helmet Head" LOLI guess they were looking for agents that would make an impression on viewers even if it was a negative one!