Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

81
Posts
11
Votes
Chris Vasquez
  • Real Estate Investor
  • DFW, TX
11
Votes |
81
Posts

TV show. Million Dollar Listing

Chris Vasquez
  • Real Estate Investor
  • DFW, TX
Posted

I don't know if any of you saw the episode last night. The LA based tv show follows a few agents around who deal with million dollar+ listings. Here's the scenario. Two agents co-broker a listing for 5mil. They know it is over priced. The owner thinks differently. We've all been there at some point. One of the brokers brings an offer from a investment group for 3mil but not to purchase out right. They want to be on title of the property with the current owner. They are hoping to share profits in the future sale of the property. When the market recovers. This scenario instantly sounded sketchy.

1. If the investors have that much money to throw down in cash. Why share title and hold for the market to recover.
2. Why not just make a 3mil offer, get it shot down by the unreasonable owner and move on. It's LA. There's got to be other deals that will come along with a quicker turn around.

Here's my cynical opinion. 1. Investors take 3mil control of the property. The original owner loses interest and finally sells his share to the invstors for little or nothing just to get off the title.
Which is what the investors planned all along. 2. Smells of dirty money.
Or, they are just testing out the owner to see how desperate he is to sell. Could be just creative genious at work.
What do you all think?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

81
Posts
11
Votes
Chris Vasquez
  • Real Estate Investor
  • DFW, TX
11
Votes |
81
Posts
Chris Vasquez
  • Real Estate Investor
  • DFW, TX
Replied

Like Oh My God, Becky. Chad reminded me of the movie Valley Girl. I know, I know Sir Mixalot reference. It's all relative. Thanks for the replies and thanks to everyone on this site for sharing your knowledge. I have learned more on BP than all the guru books I have read over the years. I'm still lmao.

Loading replies...