Note: If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions.

Also conduct an eviction search to make sure she was never even named in an unlawful detainer action (I don't allow any prior evictions, ever). 

That's considered "self help" and is unlawful.

The case is beyound just churning, from failure to give notice, unlawful entry, theft and wrongful sale...anyway, that's something else.If anyone needs assistance or wants some infromation of L/O, installment contracts or seller financed, feel free to contact me, it free!

Unfortunate that it does end up punishing legitimate people with legitimate business expenses as they're looking to expand.If I paid to run a yellow letter campaign in a new market and never closed a deal, I can't think of any justification for that not being a current expense.  

If the tenant does not comply, it is the landlord’s prerogative to file an unlawful detainer or not.

If no one responds within a reasonable time, file an unlawful retainer.

Even if the incident was an eviction, I would want to know what the circumstances were.... there is a big difference between being legally evicted because an apartment is being converted to a condo and the tenant leaves when asked to do so, in comparison to refusing to leave after ones legal right to stay in a unit has expired and then unlawfully detaining and it becoming a case before the court.

It's the classic case of the victim getting punished more than the assailant go figure.

Performance is to move out without another mark on their public record for Unlawful Detainer.