Definitely one of the only paid subscriptions that I actually use regularly and am not upset about whenever the yearly charge goes through.

RE syndications were almost cannot miss until a couple of years ago (regularly returning near 20% or higher), but that is no longer the case.  

Local developers who market that benefit won't tell you that.Also, I regularly see ads for large new condo developments so, if I was a buyer, I'd be concerned about overbuilding, especially given my previous remark.

@Scott Trench I was actually thinking that this would be great for regular, non-foreclosures. 

In my experience, people with an athletic or military background understand the value of hard work and also realize that consistency will bring results eventually.. every set back is an opportunity to learn, grow and get better for the next at-bat.Training and onboarding:As far as programs or tools, I've tried monitoring CRMs and more in-depth platforms (like Sisu) to track agent activities/KPIs.

The fundamental is that the asset (real estate) does literally NOTHING without active operational inputs on a consistent, regularized basis. 

Until something shows up in the regular mail, ignore them.

Must be nice.Edit: Telling me that my property was a bad investment 15-20 years ago is like me telling you that you failed as a stock investor because you didn't beat the S&P 500.First I was purchasing RE since 1993 and 13 years ago (not quite 15 but I suspect similar buy criteria) I started purchasing regularly.  13 years ago 1% properties were a dime a dozen.  2% was the goal (the rule used to be called the 2% rule) and was challenging in coastal southern Ca, but 1.5% was not that hard to find. 

Weeks of poop in shared yard regularly not picked up.

However, I'd like to see some income showing that they can pay for utilities, and regular living expenses.