data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f21b/8f21bfc4cd0a1d751a69c2a3a0b0b866db21f817" alt=""
15 August 2018 | 8 replies
Just wanted to gove conservative numbers!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b638/8b638b40ebc776b352b2cc5566224f69e796e72b" alt=""
17 August 2018 | 19 replies
I do not want our clients to be the precedent setters so we are conservative as these SDIRAs are great tools.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a96d/4a96d5843474a2320240ba81c9eb813c0a8866a5" alt=""
17 August 2018 | 10 replies
If I read this rightGross Income Reported is $81900Vacancy 5%GIR-Vac @ 5% is $77805NOI $55805From what I can calculate that works out to a 9.71% cap rateWhich puts the est Property Value at $541,867 That's not too far off which is good.With the 50% method and using 10% Vacancy Rate, it drops the value down to $357,862 Gross Income Reported $ 81,900 Vacancy 10% GIR -VAC $ 73,710 NOI $ 36,855 Listed Cap % 9.71 Est Prop Value $ 357,862 Now again my math may be off but I think that you should be somewhere between those 2 numbers on price and of course that will depend on a lot of other factors and how conservative or aggressive you want to be with your numbers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b1ae/2b1ae6b50d05d1cf6e12e9ce64f5d4462e712f3d" alt=""
21 August 2018 | 7 replies
Hi Matt, in my experience and in speaking with other investors who have bought vacation rentals I would lean on the side of being very conservative with my underwriting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9669/f9669f1817c60205ddcda462328c5be66110df45" alt=""
9 July 2018 | 12 replies
Using the criteria of buying at 80% of the asking price ($159000) and using relatively conservative numbers when calculating my expenses I am looking at close to 400 dollars per month cash flow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/196f2/196f2c55b93869e0d7bee9e99552eb236451bf39" alt=""
11 July 2018 | 5 replies
@Bryce SablotnyBelieve me, you are always better to err on the side of being too conservative.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7321/a732195222e83a1d1ac1c066988fe22012953d8f" alt=""
25 July 2018 | 5 replies
I'm more at the 60-70% rule which seems overly conservative to me although many buildings are very old and need a lot of work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e4ea/0e4ea6dd9129b08d7157e6a4f1d91c87d4c63e18" alt=""
9 April 2019 | 5 replies
Succinctly, I think there's an art and a science and that you should use conservative underwriting and follow the data.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9fdf/b9fdf2b81b0217bad6e1a3bf994d4e752bd226b0" alt=""
14 July 2018 | 8 replies
ARV is around 450k on the conservative side.I've flipped a few properties with a couple in the 500k-600k range.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9524a/9524a8c607a59a0ea35b7476668567fbb7dbe6e0" alt=""
13 July 2018 | 25 replies
I'd just be sure that you were good (preferably conservative) in your analysis.