Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (3,907+)
Anthony Washington Exit Strategy
13 April 2010 | 8 replies
According to this new legislation, in many states of the country, owner finance is pretty much illegal now unless you are doing it with your homestead or unless you have a mortgage broker's license.My recommendation is to wholesale it and move on.
Account Closed Staying on top of changing laws
26 April 2010 | 7 replies
The REIA where I belong is one; in Phila there is also HAPCO; then there is also PROA.Some attorneys also will have updates to legislation, so if you have working relationships with such attorneys you would get a heads up whenever things are changing.Not sure if any PM could be relied upon for this; maybe if they had a good track record of doing so ...
Rich Schroeder violence from the left
30 April 2010 | 2 replies
whether or not you agree with the new AZ legislation, it's interesting how the violence from the left got downplayed significantly in most of the media, including FOX.
Joe Arocha a loan modification done but been turned down
9 May 2009 | 1 reply
menu=234&id=922 13 weeks the The legislation signed by the President on November 21st,2008 and now Unemployment Insurance Extended Benefits: On April 24, 2009, legislation was enacted that will allow Arizona to pay up to 13 weeks of Extended Benefits (EB) to individuals who have exhausted their regular Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits.
Rob Rey Fannie Mae owned property , flipping rules ?
31 August 2009 | 21 replies
There is legislation soon to be presented to the government "all-knowing" powers on the stupidity of these rulings.
Patrick D. HR 1728
10 June 2009 | 14 replies
But the heinous piece of the legislation is in section 101(3)(e), which defines the affected principals as:> '(E) does not include, with respect to a residential mortgage loan, a person, estate, or trust that provides mortgage financing for the sale of 1 property in any 36-month period, provided that such loan-> (i) is fully amortizing;> (ii) is with respect to a sale for which the seller determines in good faith and documents that the buyer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan;> (iii) has a fixed rate or an adjustable rate that is adjustable after 5 or more years, subject to reasonable annual and lifetime limitations on interest rate increases; and> (iv) meets any other criteria the Federal banking agencies may prescribe; and> > Yeah, I know, confusing.
Tony Tomasek Official BiggerPockets Discussion of House Bill (HR) 1728
20 June 2009 | 54 replies
That piece of legislation is just that a piece of legislation still to be debated and amended and possibly passed.Worrying over that legislation is pointless at this point.
Tony Severino House Bill 1787 = Death to our Industry?
10 June 2009 | 6 replies
It is the same with most all bills, it will have some unintended consequences, but will not stop those who do things correctly.There is one hope that I see that will deal a "death blow" to those who would legislate away our freedoms.
Michael Rossi How Can It Be?
16 June 2009 | 27 replies
Laws are created by the legislative branch of the government.