
27 March 2017 | 41 replies
I agree that the (same' ole) traditional approaches will reap the same results, so I'm hoping to 'disrupt' the industry's apple cart a bit here by making more intelligent inroads by targeting more 'desirable' clientele, so if by chance this sounds intriguing to anyone potentially interested in investing in a scaleable (online based) alternative to 'business as usual...'

2 April 2017 | 42 replies
Like night and day or apples and oranges if you prefer.

26 March 2017 | 6 replies
In time I could have safely weeded out the bad apples who may have been of a violent disposition, but I'm not sure the juice was worth the squeeze.

27 January 2017 | 6 replies
To be as apples-apples as possible, what sort of rent roll would you get with existing housing for that investment size?

30 January 2017 | 7 replies
Homes also go out of foreclosure so it might be a little challenging for a first bite at the apple.

3 February 2017 | 48 replies
I would prefer to not live in the cities around Minneapolis being that I work in apple valley and would not want to add time to my commute which would give me less time to work on a given property.

1 February 2017 | 25 replies
I don't compare our properties or strategies to anyone else, because it's not apples to apples.

12 February 2017 | 7 replies
Come up with the closest apples to apples example you can come up with.

11 February 2017 | 6 replies
In the days before the internet & instant credit checks and background info at your finger tips, a few bad apples were able to fly under the radar, not so much anymore, thank God!

10 May 2017 | 41 replies
Thus you'd need to adjust for both risk and for active management (time) to make somewhat of an apple-to-apples comparison.