so if you're truly looking at it as a business model you need to factor in the cost savings or "rent you're paying to yourself" - usually while fixing up an otherwise unrentable house (it's amazing what we'll put up with when we're remodeling our own places isn't it).If you ever watch real poker players not the tv actor types they never keep all their chips on the table.  

I cannot figure out from the wording if the Tenant is waiving the right to this act, or the Lessor does, or neither??

There will always be bad apples, but at least the state CAN go after licensed bad actors, punish them financially, or even put them out of business for their misdeeds.

@Denny PughI really dont know what falls under the act or not.  

If feasible, you should include vandalism & malicious mischief coverage.

I have had great luck and also ran into some very bad actors .. and I am highly experienced.

If you want a simple database I would recommend ACT or Outlook.

Anyone, attorneys especially, tried enforcing a HML referral fee contract, since passage of the SAFE Act?Or

Is this because of the SAFE act or to keep your out of pocket costs low?

I have a DP1 and specifically paid to have vandalism and malicious mischief added to the list of named perils.