From a personal psychological perspective, the moat in flipping seems smaller since it is so popular which means more competition, though this may not be true at the ~$1M price point in CA.MultiFamily/ApartmentsUpsides:BRRRS can make more sense here, since I could use a property manager to manage the propertyCan purchase larger units outside of CA and the deal sizes can be large enough to be worth my time (as opposed to being limited to single family flips in bay area)More options for financing given underlying cash flow ?

Tharp's thesis is once people get their psychology correct (they have their heads screwed on right), the specific approaches they use to build wealth are of secondary importance.

Homes come with immense psychological baggage, properties do not.

I listened to the podcast this morning with Robert Greene and let me just start by saying it is packed with psychological content.

I’ll try to make a similar argument from a psychological standpoint by asking a different question.

If you don't sell, you haven't lost it, but that's a huge psychological impact.  3.

It does seem that it helps with the psychology of “selling” if you offer a few options.

They probably have a psychological issue.

I think there are several different answers to this question and I'll focus on one of the base psychological reasons we don't -- because we haven't heard Brandon and David talk about it on the podcast.  

It's a complex psychological issue.