Could be a purveyor of 'dangerous breed' dogs, trying to drum up sales of guard dogs Or a security company trying to sell alarms Or kids pranking In any case, I'm sure we can all make a strong distinction between simple trespassing/banana theft and B&E in the middle of the night.

Otherwise, you time isn't that valuable.And you never know who gets a kick back or other flavor for advocating the use of these sharks.

When dh and I were married, we were taught to avoid debt like the plague-- no distinction was made between good and bad debt.

Take a deep breath, put down the Flavor Aid, and get some perspective on ACRE and it Guru.

The residents of the neighborhood know if the MHP is a trouble spot or just older.An important distinction, Greg.

At a minimum, the grantor should NOT retain any power to revoke, distinct or amend the trust; reserve any rights to take back property once transferred to the trust; have any authority on how trust property will be managed on invested; have any control over income distributions from the trust and serve as trustee.So if you are controlling it and are using the funds from it, then it will be brought back into your estate for tax purposes and will be accessible to a court and creditors.There are many types of trusts out there and each situation should utilize a different type of trust to achieve your goals.Joe

Welcome to the BP family and it is interesting to see the international flavor the forum is getting.

@Ryan McGlasson we are talking about 2 distinct roles that are both referred to as "sponsor" - a loan sponsor, and a syndication sponsor.

I have no time for that anyway lol).During a real estate transaction,a distinction must be made between a real property(consisting of the land,the appurtenant rights and the "fixtures" such as trees,site-built homes and the likes,etc...)and personal property(the seller's car,couch,chandeliers and the likes,etc...)

In no circumstance do I see myself giving them back the EMD.Anyway, the only distinction I was really looking to make was whether or not the first buyer would have a legitimate claim to the house if they didn't go the LP route.