I'm interested to see the impact in has on both new development of SF and MF.I also wonder how it is going to impact the demand in the rental market based on aesthetics.

They expect everything to be seamless, paperless, convenient and aesthetically pleasing to the eye. 

I'm sure they would enforce it for aesthetic reasons. 

Sam & Heather Jones Nice results, financially and aesthetically.

The biggest division issue between developers like us and architects is in finding one that understands the balance between design aesthetics and cost of construction.

And setting aside the awful, handwritten signs, does it really help any neighborhood's aesthetics to have signs that talk about "foreclosure help" staked in every corner?

Also to be considered is that the plywood fasteners, nails or screws,  will have left lots of holes in the wood flooring which may have been covered up for a reason other than aesthetics.  

Hardie planks looks 100 times better, but for rentals you typically just aim for functionality and not worry as much about aesthetics.

The property was built in 1978, so it isn't the most aesthetically pleasing, but the tenants there love living there (from what it seemed like during my walk thru). 

(school, lot, area, desirability)But when it comes to aesthetics, mechanics, roof these all can be address "affordably" if numbers work.When is comes to structural, or foundation issues.... then it's depends on ###s if you can turn a profit if you fix it.