Okay, the "small multi in a D location having more X" thing doesn't necessarily apply here, but don't expect major capital improvements to boost value (and/or rents) as much as would be the case in a better location.Management: 7%, really?

@Thuy Pham-Satrappe  simple answer BOTH  .In addition In the Cleveland markets, most think a duplex will cash flow much higher then a SF, well that is not always the case. In

Or second worst-case, in a few years, if for whatever reasons, you've lost interest in keeping it at least you can sell it for a profit of some kind and repurpose the profit. 

Case in point, one roof on each property but per unit of cash flow the duplex roof will usually be cheaper.  

It would allow the landlord to obtain an order of possession immediately after the court decides an eviction case in favor of the landlord, instead of having to wait 10 days to allow the tenant to appeal.The order of possession would then be served on the tenant, and the eviction could take place on the 12th day after being served, unless an appeal is filed within 10 days after the court decision.

I can present my case as far as why they can benefit from a master lease but what info can I present to help my case in making them understand that I am the best person to own/operate that building?

It is obvious from your comments that you do not understand what happens to liens, how they are prioritized and what liens survive the sale.Here, hoa debts absolutely survive a mtg foreclosure and as @Chad Urbshott pointed out, it seems that is the case in WA also.

But whether that remains the case in the long term is hard to predict.

But, these 2 examples are case in point why you should be wary of any of it. 

This requires a little tact and diplomacy on the part of your PM, but have they gently asked the tenant if that is the case?In