Once again you state "I'm sure that Anderson provides competent service", meaning you don't know for sure, but have decided to come back at me because of what I've not only said about them, but what I've said about what you don't know about them. Hmmm. I could respond to every little thing that you said, but I didn't take the time to read your whole response. I'm sure there are nuggets in there and I'm actually getting a good laugh at the fact that I have an LLC in Arizona that isn't doing anything. As a matter of fact, I shared some laughs with some investors in St. Louis this week over the very same thing and we all thought it was pretty funny. Get that, someone who's so afraid to pull the trigger on something that he starts an LLC and doesn't do anything with it. What a waste. If you're against asset protection that much, then good on you, but I'm all about protecting the very soon-to-be company that I'm going to be building from the ground up. I don't need a huge company with hundreds of LLCs to start out with. I start with Missouri and get my LLCs and C Corporation with appropriate structuring in Nevada for anonymity compliance and charging order protection and that's what is my business/company plan. If that doesn't work for you or you see that as worthless, well good for you. I'm surprised that you're so threatened by someone providing information regardless of whether or not you endorse the concepts or not. I've even made it clear that while someone may not do business with this firm in Nevada, the information that they provide is great. Since this is all about due diligence, then watching some youtube videos online for FREE doesn't seem like there's anything to lose for anybody, whether it's you or someone reading these posts. In the end, I'm sorry that you're threatened. I state facts and can clearly laugh about my own stupidity. Robert Kiyosaki (to mention him again) is a best-selling author, are you?? Is anyone mentioning books authored by Jerry W?? Robert Kiyosaki is not the only one that talks about asset protection (which can lead to tax advantages/benefits), but he's the one I'm quoting. Go with or without Anderson, the information is the same. I've never seen anyone so threatened by information. This is biggerpockets, right? Where as much information is gathered for the benefit of the community as possible so that the community can decide for itself what best suits their business needs.
While there are folks on this site that do not do this asset protection stuff, who are you to say that the information can't or shouldn't be provided because little Jerry W says so. Grow up. "If I see you advising folks to buy their (Anderson) service, I will expose your advice for what it is ill informed. They probably offer a very good service, in fact it is very likely they do." I'm trying not to chuckle as I what you claim and say. You're going to expose me for my advice that is ill informed and you clearly state "They PROBABLY offer a very good service......" meaning that you do not have first hand knowledge at all. Now who is ill informed???? Everyone's risk tolerance is different as both Brandon Turner and Josh Dorkin have said not to mention countless others. So for those of us who have low risk tolerance, we choose to implement asset protection and use any tax advantages that those measures of asset protection advise. Tell you what, you continue to bash asset protection and then come after me for being ill informed "say it ain't so - the mortal wound of Jerry W coming after me" and I'll continue to research and share what I find out without appearing to solicit any specific firm. In the end, the community can actually decide for themselves if they even want the protection or to what level they want to implement protection that does come with some tax benefits. Again, I've never met someone so threatened by information.
Oh, I'm going to be exposed by Jerry W. I'll try not to lose sleep tonight because the great Jerry W contradicts information that Robert Kiyosaki clearly advocates and endorses.