Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tushar P.

Tushar P. has started 6 posts and replied 314 times.

@Tony Kim yes, I get that. My point is that while diversification will take care of the downside, the upside is nowhere close to what growth stocks offer. For example, think of 10 growth stocks, where after 5 years, 4 give average return, 3 go sideways, 2 result in complete loss, and 1 goes 30x. What if 2 went 30x? Most people won’t be able to handle the volatility that precedes the realization of 30x (it wouldn’t happen linearly like real estate), even if they understood what they are investing in.

I am lucky to have entered the workforce 12 years ago and started investing when the stock market was at its lowest. It has only gone up since then - zero effort index funds have yielded 5-6x in last 12 years. I had one stock yield 47x after 5 years (it was under water for first 4 years), another 14x in 11 years (it went to 7x in 4 years and then back to 1x in 7 years), and another is at 5x in 6 years (this has been a linear increase). Exactly 3 years ago I bought a stock that was 80% down 8 months ago, but now sitting at 3x. I expect at least 10x by year 5, but it can also go back to 1x or go up to 100x by year 5. For anyone who had the guts to dump money during March-April last year has a range of 2x-20x. If I can handle such volatility then why should I invest in real estate any further than the 20+ syndications that I already have (mostly invested during second half of 2019) - that’s what I’m struggling with. By the way, I dump 10k/month in index funds, the safety of which is what gives me the stomach to handle stock volatility, besides the fact that I have time on my side.

Also, I have lost money in the stock market, but they seem like noise compared to the gains. Will the losses in real estate ever seem like noise compared to the gains? Remains to be seen. None of the syndications have exited yet, some are 10 year opportunity zone funds.

@Account Closed yes, the hedge fund managers can risk a few million dollars and still have no significant impact to their net worth. They are also willing to have a few lean years as one good year will make the lean years look like noise. For real estate investments, maybe I need to find a reit that pays ~8-10% dividends and doubles it’s stock price every 3-5 years - because that will roughly mimic what the combined portfolio of investments in 20+ syndications is expected to yield. But I guess no such reit exists, hence the need for individual syndications.

What I’m struggling with is that some of these syndications come with a risk of losing all the money (just like hedge funds or risky stocks) but the upside is nowhere as high as what risky investments like hedge funds or stocks can yield. Other option is to invest in less risky syndications but that will lower the potential return. Since my current risk tolerance is quite high, I’m wondering if I should invest in real estate only after a few decades when I’m close to retirement and have lower risk tolerance.

Originally posted by @Account Closed:

Im not sure why you would think that's a good syndicator to work with. Only someone with no track record having a hard time finding investors would have to do that. I would rather work with experienced syndicators with a long history of exits. Also, the GP has to front all the money for due diligence and screening. They also provide guarantees for the loan. Why do you think that is not worth anything? If a syndicator came to me with the terms you propose, I would be way to skeptical to invest with them. Good syndicators have a list of investors ready to put money into their next deal and rarely even need new investors. The best ones deal directly with Family Offices and dont want your measly 100K.

I am comparing real estate syndication with non real estate hedge funds as an investment choice. We have already seen over the last year that non real estate return (average, not even highest) has yielded what the best real estate return may not yield even with 10+ yr hold. If I have to put money into real estate syndications even for the sake of diversification then the preference would be to find a syndicator that could at least match the terms similar to the hedge funds. I would expect such a syndicator to be well renowned and institutional (just like hedge funds) and not mom & pop. The hedge funds that offer the terms I mentioned above are very few - they don’t need new investors either and have a minimum of 1-2 million. The hedge funds have to spend money on due diligence and asset management too, but seems like their interests are completely aligned with the investor when they offer to make absolutely zero money until the investor makes at least 6-8%. 

I do have investment into a real estate syndication as a co-GP where one of the GP is a family office. This family office will indeed make zero money until I make 8% (by giving up their portion of asset mgmt fees to me) but the main syndicator will still take their portion of asset mgmt fees. So it’s not like I have found a syndicator who can match hedge fund terms and demonstrate that their interests are completely aligned with that of the investors.

@AJ Singh yes, I see that. Most syndicators are offering what any Tom, Dick, and Harry can deliver. Haven’t seen any syndicator who actually has the confidence on themselves (about all the qualities/experiences they proudly state) to offer promote combined with zero fees.

Like how some of the hedge fund managers who take fees only after promote: e.g. 20% of the profits only after 6% or 8% return, and no asset mgmt fees. 

@Account Closed
 have you come across any syndicator who has the guts/confidence to offer a deal where they have substantial skin in the deal and make absolutely zero money until the LPs make 6% or 8%?

Originally posted by @AJ Singh:

@Tony Kim

Even a small percentage of your real estate in multifamily syndication will not yield the same results as your direct ownership.. The full bonus depreciation is only available to a person who is a real estate professional ( and there is a certain criteria to that designation as per IRS) 

Talking of bonus depreciation, whether it is useful or not to the LPs was discussed briefly here:

https://www.biggerpockets.com/...
 

Post: New Girl Looking to Invest, but where?!

Tushar P.Posted
  • Posts 332
  • Votes 171

Make sure you check the forums thoroughly

https://www.biggerpockets.com/...

Originally posted by @Melanie Liu:

Again, thank you all for your responses! To be fair to the builder, he offered to have my deposit back or accept the new market price. During the past 7 months the builder released more homes in phases in the same sub-division, each time with higher prices. I'm curious what he'll do with those buyers. I totally understand that material prices have gone up, and it's tough on builders. I'm willing to accept some price increases, but not the new market price. One way to another, that's the basic rule I'll stick to.

I appreciate all your feedback, advises, and philosophical thinking ("Life is too short for anger." - love it). Year 2000 is unprecedented, and I wish everyone good luck in real estate investing.

Tell yourself you are walking away with your deposit back because you don’t have a better option, not because it is fair. The builder wouldn’t have offered you a lower market price or walk away with your deposit if the market had gone the other way. The builder is lucky he is dealing with you. I would not have let him act unethically and get away.

@Melanie Liu do you have free legal plan through your work? I have free access to the best lawyers (including those who specialize in real estate) and I think I should make sending demand letters my new hobby. When I was in a such a situation I made sure that the other party knew I had free access to best lawyers (casually saying “need to check what the lawyer says since I have free access to them”) and then just sending a threatening demand letter did the job. I stopped communicating after the lawyer sent the letter. Good lawyers make realtors redundant and incompetent builders very cooperative.

Just check what kind of legal plan your employer provides. The best option is to get some money from the builder and walk away.

Post: A Deal Gone Wrong - What's Next?

Tushar P.Posted
  • Posts 332
  • Votes 171

@Tinah Canda what I don’t understand is why is your lawyer acting so spineless. Your lawyer should be able to see through this tactic and turn it around to the seller’s lawyer. 

Post: Tokenization of rental income

Tushar P.Posted
  • Posts 332
  • Votes 171

@Justin Goodrich there are startups in California a few steps ahead already…