@Tony Kim yes, I get that. My point is that while diversification will take care of the downside, the upside is nowhere close to what growth stocks offer. For example, think of 10 growth stocks, where after 5 years, 4 give average return, 3 go sideways, 2 result in complete loss, and 1 goes 30x. What if 2 went 30x? Most people won’t be able to handle the volatility that precedes the realization of 30x (it wouldn’t happen linearly like real estate), even if they understood what they are investing in.
I am lucky to have entered the workforce 12 years ago and started investing when the stock market was at its lowest. It has only gone up since then - zero effort index funds have yielded 5-6x in last 12 years. I had one stock yield 47x after 5 years (it was under water for first 4 years), another 14x in 11 years (it went to 7x in 4 years and then back to 1x in 7 years), and another is at 5x in 6 years (this has been a linear increase). Exactly 3 years ago I bought a stock that was 80% down 8 months ago, but now sitting at 3x. I expect at least 10x by year 5, but it can also go back to 1x or go up to 100x by year 5. For anyone who had the guts to dump money during March-April last year has a range of 2x-20x. If I can handle such volatility then why should I invest in real estate any further than the 20+ syndications that I already have (mostly invested during second half of 2019) - that’s what I’m struggling with. By the way, I dump 10k/month in index funds, the safety of which is what gives me the stomach to handle stock volatility, besides the fact that I have time on my side.
Also, I have lost money in the stock market, but they seem like noise compared to the gains. Will the losses in real estate ever seem like noise compared to the gains? Remains to be seen. None of the syndications have exited yet, some are 10 year opportunity zone funds.