@Jim M. - You have clearly asked a question that has inspired a bit of debate, which is good. Debate works as a way to break apart these complicated tax matters and get to the heart of each issue individually. As far as your crowdfunding site question, my inclination is that the IRS would consider this the same as buying a stock or mutual fund as an investment and not being an active trader or real estate investor that would qualify you as being "in business".
@Nicole Bernshaw - Brandon's email response and @Natalie Kolodij are right on this one without much question. Education that qualifies you for a new trade or business is non-deductible. I couldn't deduct my college expense (as a business expense), CPA exam fees or my CPA prep classes as it prepared me for a new career (pub 970). Now that I am a practicing CPA, any classes that I take to sharpen those skills are deductible. Unfortunately that other CPA is wrong. Unless you were in the real estate world and performing a skill that would be sharpened, there is no way to correctly deduct it under the tax code as written. So don't bother reading the tax code trying to find that loophole, it won't say anything different.
@Ashish Acharya - That's a doozy of a statement to say that that taxpayer could have used section 195 to capitalize those education expenses as start up costs, even acknowledging it's a risky position. The IRS has levied penalties on tax preparers who have intentionally and recklessly disregarded the rules in determining a business client's deductions. The tax case doesn't specifically address whether the taxpayer could use section 195 on those because it stated that they weren't deductible at all as a business expense as it was determined the classes qualified him for a new trade or business.
Here's a fancy graph of the timeline of deductibilty and where it falls for those of us who enjoy pictures vs a bunch of dry back and forth between CPAs.
J of A - How to Scale the Wall of Deductibility