Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tom Gimer

Tom Gimer has started 12 posts and replied 3418 times.

Post: Title company screwed up taxes and county back charging taxes for 4-5 years

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

Based upon the tax certificate issued and relied upon at settlement, I would be requesting that the taxing authority abate the liens against the property and pursue the seller directly for the amounts now claimed to be owed.

Post: How to do wholesaling RIGHT? In Maryland/East Coast and Nationwide.

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

We deal with some of the best "we buy" folks on the east coast.

When the property condition is unexpected, they terminate during the study period... as they have reserved the right to do. But for good properties at the right price, when they can't find an investor to assign to for a decent profit, they CLOSE (either with cash or private, great terms) and resell when a proper buyer comes along.

Pretty simple really.

People who do this right are seriously networked.

Post: Sub2 on an FHA loan in Pueblo, CO

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

Can't do sub2 on FHA with a title company that knows the repercussions. They can get blackballed forever from closing FHA. I've posted about this previously and provided copy of the guidance.

Post: Title insurance claim regarding Easement dispute

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

From OP @Victor Valencia

Hi Tom.

It seems I need 10 votes to reply to the discussion, which feels like a significant barrier. BP should consider improving this policy to encourage more inclusive participation. I appreciate everyone's valuable feedback. Peter, I apologize for missing a setting when I started this post. Here's some context: The access to our properties used to be the main road until the 1970s when the city rerouted it to build a highway around our homes, giving this access to the landowner at that time. In our historical town, agreements were often informal and not well-documented until the county began proper recording in the 1980s.
Despite extensive record searches, we haven't found a defined easement. Local input and city planning suggest this access has been in use since the highway was built, potentially supporting a claim for a prescriptive easement.
While this access previously held little value, recent developments have increased its significance. Negotiating with the current landowner is possible, but the terms and potential costs are critical considerations. Our concern is that fencing off property lines could restrict our access.
Based on feedback from Tom and Peter, it seems prudent to involve Title Insurance to negotiate on our behalf for a favorable resolution.

Post: Title insurance claim regarding Easement dispute

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

So I got a private message from @Peter Walther to the effect that he was not allowed to comment on this thread.

Do you really need to be a Pro/Premium member to comment on posts? If so that is complete bullsh*t and BP may have officially jumped the shark.

Here was his message:

Apparantly I'm not allowed to comment on the question unless I upgrade to Pro. If I could, I'd first write that I don't have a disagreement with anything you wrote. I would add the OP shouldn't do anything to prejudice the insurer's ability to resolve the claim, like negotiating with the neighbor. Let the insurer take whatever steps it finds are necessary up to and including payment for the loss which may or may not be as much as or more than the amount of insurance. I would also include a link to this access story that's still playing out.

Lac du Flambeau tribe won't lower payments for residents to access reservation properties (msn.com)

--------------------

I agree with Peter that once the claim is allowed you let the attorneys retained by the title insurer take over fully... getting yourself or your own attorney involved just increases the risk of screwing things up. If the insurer denies the claim that's another story... in that case only hire an attorney experienced with title insurance claims.

Post: Title insurance claim regarding Easement dispute

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

If the neighbor(s) will not execute an agreement allowing access, a lawsuit would be necessary. And it's definitely NOT a given that the court would award the relief sought. All of the elements of an easement by necessity (or prescriptive easement, depending upon the facts) would need to be satisfied... read SD case law to find out what would need to be proven. At some point that land was subdivided -- how, when and by who is crucial. Also the nature of the current "access" -- whether it has been hostile or permissive.

The good news is the title insurance carrier has allowed the claim and will likely pursue an agreement with the necessary property owners OR fight the legal battle if necessary. And it could cost many, many thousands of dollars in legal to eventually win or lose. The fact that title insurance includes defense expense is a great lesson in why chosing NOT to purchase owners coverage is stupid.

Of course if the court doesn't award the easement, the title insurer would likely pay out on the title claim based upon the lack of access. I would say that's not a total failure of title so not a full policy payout. It would be a good time for @Peter Walther to chime in on this. He'll probably correct some of my analysis as well!

Post: Broker listed as defendant on Lis Pendens?

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

@Chris Kitchens You need to pull the docket for the lawsuit referenced in the notice of lis pendens. It’s not necessarily a foreclosure case.

Including as a defendant in the lawsuit someone who would likely be a superior lien holder suggests to me there is more going on than a straightforward foreclosure.

Or it could be something simple like an unreleased lien and the court is being asked to quiet title or otherwise weigh in on lien priority.

Let us know how it shakes out. 

Post: HELP! Why would a buyer put a house under contract to then only ghost?

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Livia Adams:

It sounds like they were wholesalers trying to sell this property but they couldn't find a buyer in time. I mean the name already states "Express Acquisitions" 

Also usually what I put in our contracts is that in case that the buyer does not close that the earnest money will be released to the seller without further instructions to escrow required. It's essentially an automatic EMD release clause in your contract, so that you don't need to run after the buyers for them to sign the release. Because they could care less. They won't see their money anyway so they don't care if it's staying in escrow forever.

In the future I would do much higher Escrows and also add the clause to the contract. 


that clause wont fly in most markets title company will still want their cancellation and escrow disbursement form filled out and signed by both parties before they will release.
I help our investor clients by drafting automatic release language for their contracts that we will follow. Clear title, clear breach + release of liability… I have no problem releasing. 

Post: Consequences of walking out of an auction purchase before closing?

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423

If you walk the property can be resold at your risk and expense. Let’s say your high bid was $100,000 and you refuse to close. The property will be re-marketed and resold. Advertising expenses for the second sale are $1,200 and the high bid upon resale is $90,000. You could be sued for $11,200 and if so, you would lose. Depending on the auction terms it could be that result plus the forfeiture of your deposit, or perhaps the trustee/auction company must elect one remedy vs. the other. The answer is in the published terms of sale.

Find a title company that understands that all that matters is that the sale proceeds wire transfer goes to the correct party. Current stockholders? lol

Post: Anyone done a "Morby Method" deal? Zero down creative strategy

Tom Gimer
Posted
  • DMV
  • Posts 3,470
  • Votes 3,423
Quote from @Jeremy Fleming:
Quote from @Tom Gimer:

Good luck finding a seller who will essentially take an unsecured 2nd on a property that is 100% leveraged. Creative as in fantasy land. This transaction has forced sale written all over it.


 Not that I think this Morbey method is the way to buy houses, I will say that I disagree with you Tom. Nearly every property I bought was with creative owner financing. 100% VTB (1st) and even had one take their equity in an unsecured note. Anything is possible if your'e open to learn.

My comment was about the specific scenario in the original post.

I love creative finance. The best investment I ever made was a long-listed property... put just enough down to get the agent paid and the owner financed the balance for 30 years.