Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Karen Parker

Karen Parker has started 17 posts and replied 384 times.

Post: Why do people wait?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by Tyler Thrush:
buyers are liars!


And sellers are worse. (To complete the old saying)

I agree they should have gotten prequalified first. When I bought my home I got prequalified for the loan before I ever started looking for a house. How else was I going to know what price range I could afford? More importantly, why bother looking at all if I have no money to pay for it. But there is also the possibility they are caught up in indecision.

Post: BOA Now Going After deficiencies?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by Pennie Ohia:
And why will a homeowner sign anything that says they are going to pay the defiency? It defeats the purpose of the short sale doesn't it?


I agree with this. I wouldn't. Why bother with a short sale if you're going to hang anyway? But perhaps when B of A eats enough properties they will change that policy.

Post: What is wrong with this ad?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42

I think it fits the intelligence level of the sheople in today's society. I've seen them buy into worse.

Post: I Just Love These Billboards!

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by Joshua Dorkin:


PMA is what got us into this mess ("the housing market will keep going up", "I can get rich in real estate in 30 days", this stock will keep going up forever, etc.), isn't it?


I think there's a line somewhere between, as Harrison said, "Staying Positive and Staying Motivated" and being a fool.

Post: Consumer Credit Card Act and Loaded Weapons?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by jawsette:
Except in the case of a military dictatorship, where the military installs their man who in is fact a dictator and is removed by death. Which is why all the ceasars had to "watch their backs" like ET U BRUTUS?


This still is not a dictatorship but an oligarchy and was not the case with the representative plebians.

Post: I Just Love These Billboards!

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42

Thank You!! Harrison. That was so wonderfully stated. And I've missed you. :D

Post: Consumer Credit Card Act and Loaded Weapons?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by jawsette:
Then again those assemblies could only be attended by those "people" considered by the authorities as Roman or influential plebians not all the people as a republic is. Thus it may have its "beginnings" there but there were too many "clases" of people not considered people to be a republic, but a dictatorship of the ruling military class.


It still would not be considered a dictatorship because a dictatorship is ruled by one.

Post: Consumer Credit Card Act and Loaded Weapons?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by jawsette:
Still does not change the fact that in all cases it was a military dictatorship. Only the "roman citizens" could actually voice their wants in the roman affairs. And most of them were military based citizens. And when any figure got to be soo influential that they tried to rule the military without the military's input and approval there were assanations which was the end of most of the Ceasars.

A dectatorship or military dictatorship or republic of dictataorships is still a dictatorship.

The principles of a republic may indeed have come from the Romans as they usually left the dominated area under the control of the defeated governments as long as those governments did not do certain things. These were only allowed by roman citizens (military) and not the plebians (controlled public).


Actually, according to what this video states, the principles of a republic were introduced in Greece by Solon. I've seen else where that they were his attempt to rescue Athens from the mess they were in but they were never adapted there. The video continues on to discuss that those same principles were adopted in Rome, "where the power of Government was limited and the people could keep the fruits of their labor." They also had legislative assemblies where the people controlled who was elected. Maybe not exactly like our own but similar. It also tells how it went from a republic to a democracy to an oligarchy.

Post: Consumer Credit Card Act and Loaded Weapons?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42

The Roman Republic was governed by a complex constitution, which centered on the principles of a separation of powers and checks and balances. The evolution of the constitution was heavily influenced by the struggle between the aristocracy, or the patricians, and other talented Romans who were not from famous families, the plebians. Early in its history, the republic was controlled by an aristocracy of individuals who could trace their ancestry back to the early history of the kingdom. Over time, the laws that allowed these individuals to dominate the government were repealed, and the result was the emergence of a new aristocracy which depended on the structure of society, rather than the law, to maintain its dominance. Thus, only a revolution could overthrow this new aristocracy.

The precise event which signaled the end of the Roman Republic and the transition into the Roman Empire is a matter of interpretation. Towards the end of the period a selection of Roman leaders came to so dominate the political arena that they exceeded the limitations of the Republic as a matter of course. Historians have variously proposed the appointment of Julius Caesar as perpetual dictator in 44 BC, the defeat of Mark Antony at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, and the Roman Senate's grant of extraordinary powers to Octavian under the first settlement in 27 BC, as candidates for the defining pivotal event ending the Republic.

Can be found at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Republic

Post: Consumer Credit Card Act and Loaded Weapons?

Karen ParkerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Tampa, FL
  • Posts 456
  • Votes 42
Originally posted by jawsette:
Sorry, Karen, but Rome was a dictatorship of the ruling military class.

It was a conglomerate of defeated states that Rome occupied and controlled until their military was defeated in that area.

It was setup as an occupied area in which a general usually was put in as supreme commander for that area, with the exception of answering to the Ceasar. If there were uprisings in his area he was expected to squash them without the assistance of the Ceasar's army.

It was a dictator under a dictator, who would fall everytime the military did no longer support him.


I guess you didn't watch the video. That came later.