Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Richard C.

Richard C. has started 19 posts and replied 1919 times.

Post: This house has no takers

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614

I'm going to agree with most of the other posts.

1.  The rent is high.  Not overwhelmingly, but high compared to comps;

2. The security deposit is high.  Too high.  Comparable listings have a 1 month SD;

3.  The phrasing of the ad will turn people off;

4.  It needs a dishwasher.  A gaping hole in the cabinets looks awful and cheap;

5.  The ability to have a pet is the reason many people prefer single families to apartments.  You are really hurting yourself there.

Only you can decide your comfort level with changes.  But the issues have been correctly identified to you.  If you do not change, you have to expect vacancy issues.

When you get an email alert saying some random dude has spazzed out at you on a two-year-old forum post...

Post: Dave Ramsey vs. Rich Dad Inevesting

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614

@#%^% &(*)   *^()   %(*) ^)) #@^$

!!!!

Post: Success Path course with Tarek and Christina, worth $2000?

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614

Ask if Christina will be wearing that crocheted mini-skirt she wore sometimes on the second season of their show.  

Post: LLC for rental property?-Still undecided

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

when u put your property into an llc, you have an added layer of protection should someone decide to sue you. if you do not take any profits from entity(llc) the person suing cannot collect. and if they do try, they have to pay taxes on property till they collect. most lawyers will not file against an llc as there is no money to be made. if they can prove you negligent as manager claim can only be made on propertys in that specific llc.

I'm not going to get involved in the whole LLC debate again, lest some cowboy come along and accuse me of wanting to deprive the children of landlords of their college funds. However, this statement: "most lawyers will not file against an llc as there is no money to be made" is simply false.

Post: Wells Fargo won't allow us to place property in LLC

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614
Originally posted by @John Chapman:

This string is hilarious.    @Jon Holdmangave the correct answer right off the bat, and he was followed up with absolutely correct advice from @Rob Beland  and @Richard C. that was based on sound experience.   All this nonsense about trusts, LLCs, and double back flips to protect a whopping 4 rental policies that are mortgaged. It's surprising that this thread has gone as long as it has.  I say this as both a plaintiff's lawyer and a landlord:  just buy the insurance and move on with your life.

 Well, thank you John, but be careful.  Last time I expressed doubt about the magical properties of single member LLCs of the sort most members here are setting up, Jerry W. accused me of wanting to deprive landlords' kids of their college funds.  It was really a remarkable rant (which made some seriously faulty assumptions about my educational and professional background.)

It's all sort of ironic. I have both an LLC and a PLLC, so I'm not opposed to them or unaware of their utility. But there is a really unfortunate amount of magical thinking that goes on here, with people thinking they can basically do whatever they want without consequence because they paid their state's corporation office a few hundred bucks in filing fees.

And that's without even going into the posters who ask if they really need an umbrella policy, since "I have my LLC." Those posts just make me feel bad.

The bottom line is that properly formed and managed LLCs have their place.  But too many posters here rely on them far too much.

Post: Investor NOT protected by LLC?!?

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614
Originally posted by @Jerry W.:

I have written posts on this area many times and do not intend to do a full article again. Please look up old threads. To shorten things up, an LLC will not protect you from a criminal act. You hit someone in the nose you are personally liable even if you were doing business as an LLC. If property was owned by an LLC someone had to be making decisions for the LLC in order to conduct business. If those decisions resulted in criminal acts the person making the decision would be liable. That is true if he is a property manager or the LLC managing member. I could not discern that from the article.

@Cameron Skinner had it correct in that LLCs work well for certain things. They do protect your assets from debts of the LLC. If you owned the LLC property personally and someone sued for a negligent act, your personal assets could be sold to satisfy the judgement. There is a reason why every state has law establishing LLCs and why millions of people use them. It is not because they are worthless. It is because they work. To say otherwise is a disregard for reality. It is not common to pierce the veil, but it can be done in the right circumstances. Most attacks are shot down by summary judgement. You are always personally liable for any act you do personally. If an LLC hires a hit man to kill someone, there was still a person who solicited the act and conspired to murder another. That is different from an LLC going bankrupt because a faulty furnace killed 3 folks by carbon monoxide poisoning and had 3 million dollar judgement against it. The biggest cause of piercing the corporate veil is not observing corporate formalities. There was also a case in Colorado where they went to the assets of an LLC without piercing the veil using standard reasons. Piercing is very rare without good reasons behind it. To say anyone kid out of lawschool can pierce one is dead wrong. There is a reason that no person with substantial assets does business outside of a corporate entity. LLCs had advantages over corporations as they can get your stock ownership but not your LLC ownership due to its partnership nature.

I want to point out, I wrote that any kid out of law school could pierce an LLC OF THE SORT MOST SMALL-TIME INVESTORS SET UP.

I absolutely stand by that statement.  What percentage of LLCs, especially single-member LLCs, do you think DO observe the corporate formalities?  I'm going to guess not more than 10%.

Post: If Ramsey and Kiyosaki had a child...would he buy this duplex?

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614

If Ramsey and Kiyosaki had a child, that child would be unable to read a P&S. But probably able to scam someone into buying the duplex for him.

Post: Investor NOT protected by LLC?!?

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614
Originally posted by @Cameron Skinner:

@Richard C. every state is different but in FL in almost 20 years of the LLC statute only one LLC has ever been cracked, FTC vs. Olmsted and this guy just transferred all his personal assets to an LLC with no business purpose, and it still took the full legal force of the Federal government to crack it. As long as it's a bonafide business interest LLCs are almost impossible to crack, at least here in FL. As I stated earlier nothing is 100% with enough lawyers and money and time maybe my LLCs can be cracked into by an outside creditor, but our goal in asset protection is to put so many hurdles in the way it's just not cost effective to even try.

 With respect, you are very seriously mistating the impact of Olmsted.  I strongly suggest you contact a Florida attorney.

Post: Investor NOT protected by LLC?!?

Richard C.Posted
  • Bedford, NH
  • Posts 2,011
  • Votes 1,614

There is nothing new about this. For the 400th time, the vast, overwhelming majority of singleco-owner LLCs provide virtually nothing in the way of insulating you from liability or protecting you assets. Piercing the veil on the sort of LLCs most all-time investors set up to hold their properties (eg, "123 Main Street,LLC") is a task that takes some kid six months out of law school a couple of hours.