Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Peter Walther

Peter Walther has started 31 posts and replied 1580 times.

Post: Past due HOA fees on just purchased property.

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:
Originally posted by @Peter Walther:
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:
Originally posted by @Peter Walther:
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:

@Peter Walther If the "seller" fails to disclose the existence of an HOA, any CCRs of record (included as special exceptions in the policy) don't reference mandatory periodic assessments, there is no recorded HOA lien, and the auction terms state that the buyer takes title subject to any existing dues or assessments, how does the title claim shake out?

My money is on a disclaimer of coverage. 

Florida is a judicial foreclosure state and Larry bought at the foreclosure sale so there was no Seller.  Based on what I know I think the claim will probably be denied but it never hurts to ask.

That's why I put "seller" in quotation marks. The "seller" here is an agent of the secured party who provides no warranties, claims to know nothing about the subject property and refuses to complete and execute standard title company documents. Standard ALTA owners + unrecorded lien = no pay (imo).

 Not to split hairs Tom but the high bidder gets a Certificate of Title from the Clerk of the Court who certifies the named party was the high bidder and the party to whom the property was sold.  I don't believe the Clerk is the Plaintiff's agent nor does he/she convey the property, I believe that happens by operation of law.  Sort of like when someone inherits property, title passes per statute.  It's not like a non judicial sale or a Deed of Trust foreclosure where the Trustee conveys the property.

You're right. But it doesn't change my reasoning. My essential point was when you are dealing with a conveyance with no warranties, which we are here as well as in the non-judicial (or quasi) foreclosure framework, that requires you to do your due diligence up front... all of it... and also to factor the unknown into your bid. So making a title claim for an unrecorded lien that, as it later turns out has priority or otherwise survives the foreclosure, that's a loser. I think we are actually in agreement on that. 

You're right, we are in agreement.

Post: Past due HOA fees on just purchased property.

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:
Originally posted by @Peter Walther:
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:

@Peter Walther If the "seller" fails to disclose the existence of an HOA, any CCRs of record (included as special exceptions in the policy) don't reference mandatory periodic assessments, there is no recorded HOA lien, and the auction terms state that the buyer takes title subject to any existing dues or assessments, how does the title claim shake out?

My money is on a disclaimer of coverage. 

Florida is a judicial foreclosure state and Larry bought at the foreclosure sale so there was no Seller.  Based on what I know I think the claim will probably be denied but it never hurts to ask.

That's why I put "seller" in quotation marks. The "seller" here is an agent of the secured party who provides no warranties, claims to know nothing about the subject property and refuses to complete and execute standard title company documents. Standard ALTA owners + unrecorded lien = no pay (imo).

 Not to split hairs Tom but the high bidder gets a Certificate of Title from the Clerk of the Court who certifies the named party was the high bidder and the party to whom the property was sold.  I don't believe the Clerk is the Plaintiff's agent nor does he/she convey the property, I believe that happens by operation of law.  Sort of like when someone inherits property, title passes per statute.  It's not like a non judicial sale or a Deed of Trust foreclosure where the Trustee conveys the property.

Post: Past due HOA fees on just purchased property.

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Tom Gimer:

@Peter Walther If the "seller" fails to disclose the existence of an HOA, any CCRs of record (included as special exceptions in the policy) don't reference mandatory periodic assessments, there is no recorded HOA lien, and the auction terms state that the buyer takes title subject to any existing dues or assessments, how does the title claim shake out?

My money is on a disclaimer of coverage. 

Florida is a judicial foreclosure state and Larry bought at the foreclosure sale so there was no Seller.  Based on what I know I think the claim will probably be denied but it never hurts to ask.

Post: Past due HOA fees on just purchased property.

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Larry Ott:

Thanks Peter, I have title insurance on the property, I expect that a title search would pick up only liens/encumbrances that have been filed against the property. Since the HOA has not filed any liens against the title, the title company would have no liability.......is that correct?

If there was no claim of lien recorded I believe you're correct, they will probably deny liability but it never hurts to submit a claim.  Worst they can do is deny it.

Post: Past due HOA fees on just purchased property.

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Larry Ott:

I recently purchased a SFR property near Ft Myers, FL at auction. It was a foreclosure property purchased through a sheriffs sale. I completed a normal title search and upon sale purchased a title policy. I have a clear title.

It is in a gated community, I contacted the HOA to get set up with them and now find that there is a little over $4,000.00 in back HOA fees that they are looking to me to pay. These fees go back over a year.

My question is: Has anyone had experience with a situation like this, am I am just going to get stuck paying these fees?

Submit a claim to the title insurance underwriter, not the policy issuing agent. If your policy has an exception for HOA fees the claim will probably be denied and then you'll have to see if you can negotiate a reduction in the HOA's demand. The association doesn't really have an incentive to reduce its demand so don't be surprised if they don't. Unfortunatly, I believe Florida Statute 720.3085(2)(a) provides the answer to your question. It reads:

(2)(a) A parcel owner, regardless of how his or her title to property has been acquired, including by purchase at a foreclosure sale or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, is liable for all assessments that come due while he or she is the parcel owner. The parcel owner’s liability for assessments may not be avoided by waiver or suspension of the use or enjoyment of any common area or by abandonment of the parcel upon which the assessments are made.

I'm not an attorney and this is not legal advice.  It's my opinion based on many years of handling title insurance claims throughout the country for various title insurance underwriters.  Good luck.

Post: Florida Rental comps

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693

Zillow & Rent O Meter

Post: REO cannot get title insurance

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @William Joseph:

@Peter Walther I think there is a huge distinction when the party in possession is the former owner. Have you ever insured REO title in MA? I noted in my comment that there is a distinction (subtle but very important) in MA and other non-judicial states which is that there is an element that becomes judicial when you have to get the non-military finding. It gives the owner a judicial forum to raise challenges.

I can't recall ever handling a party in possession (PIP) claim for property in MA but I have in other NJF states.  After reading your initial post on this topic I did some quick research on the NJF process including

http://www.rackemann.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Foreclosure-Guide.pdf

 and agree it may have a judicial aspect to it.  That doesn't change my concern with buying a property where the seller has told the buyer there may be a PIP and please don't disturb them.  The PIP may or may not be the former owner and even if their interest has been extinguished in the foreclosure they may raise it again.  I handled a claim in TX where the deceased owner/borrower's interest had been extinguished but her partner claimed he was the deceased's common law husband and had made many of the mortgage payments and therefore should have been named in the NJF.  18 months and about $25k later the Court agreed he has wrong and the insured was able to get him removed from the property.

Post: REO cannot get title insurance

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @William Joseph:

If the property is in MA you may want to consult you MA title agent or attorney. MA has a non-judicial foreclosure process. However, there is a finding of non-military service which needs to be made in the land court (done in connection with the eviction). Many defenses are raised collaterally attacking the underlying judgment so some title insurers may say it is not worth the risk. In CT we are a judicial foreclosure state so buying an occupied property doesn't pose the same risk to a title insurer. 

I disagree with your conclusion a judicial foreclosure doesn't have the same risk related to a party in possession.  I worked on many title claims where the policy didn't have an exception for parties in possession, both in non-judicial and judicial states.  The type of foreclosure didn't seem to have a bearing.  What's important is if there is someone in the property post foreclosure.  I'm curious if there's an eviction in the record brought by the lender now trying to sell.  In my experience most lenders try to clear any occupants before marketing the property because I believe an unoccupied property sells for more than an occupied one.

Post: REO cannot get title insurance

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

@Account Closed You are confusing things.

Yes, a Special Warranty Deed means the Seller is only guaranteeing/agreeing to defend, title issues while they owned it. 

Title Insurance though, has Nothing to do with the bank. It is from one of the major title insurers guaranteeing title, assuming it is clear at the time, regardless of how the property is bought. 
I have gotten title insurance, or provided it to sellers, on every property ever bought....REO's, QCD, and foreclosure suctions.
No need to confuse people with your anti bank conspiracy issues. 

I have the same question I posed to an earlier poster and never received an answer to.  The title policies your referring to, do they have an exception to coverage for parties in possession?

Post: REO cannot get title insurance

Peter WaltherPosted
  • Specialist
  • Winter Springs, FL
  • Posts 1,612
  • Votes 693
Originally posted by @Michael Noto:

@Rich Hupper You should be able to get title insurance. We have closed on 3-4 of these same types of deals here in CT during the past year and have gotten title insurance on each deal. 

 Is there an exception from coverage for parties in possession?