Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Phillip Tillotson

Phillip Tillotson has started 4 posts and replied 60 times.

Post: Seller Financing with Rent back, POSSIBLE?

Phillip TillotsonPosted
  • Ozark , MO
  • Posts 61
  • Votes 40
Originally posted by @Bill Gulley:
Originally posted by @Brian Gibbons:

@Bill Gulley

Looks like I can benefit greatly from a TIC agreement class ! :)

 Working on it now Brian, since it touches on all strategies I'm putting it ahead of notes. 

With all the changes in real estate, accounting requirements, taxes and financing, it's time to bring this out of my tool box! 

As always....  :)

Less talking and more course writing! :) I'm equally excited to see this course come to life!

Originally posted by @Devan Mcclish:

@JT Spangler

I am going to suggest something no one else did.

Put it under contract at a future price. Ask them what they want for it and put it under contract for x amount of time. Put the expiration date 20 years in the future. This guarantees you first right of refusal because you have it under contract. 

just stipulate that it won't close until after they die, then once they do, close on it at the price you agreed upon, terminate because the price is too high, or renegotiate the price down if the market turns down, which it will

Just a thought :)

 @Bill Gulley can you please remind me why having an option for 20 years is a bad idea? (Or possibly that I am not remembering this correctly)

Originally posted by @Julian Buick:

@Phillip Tillotson

 @Bill Gulley

 Why did you choose the fourth edition of the principles of real estate? There is a 6th edition that was released in 2013. Would that not be more relevant?

Thanks

It would be if you were trying to obtain your real estate license. I was not trying to do that. We used it to learn the basic principles which don't change much.

Traditionally, this was used when houses were selling fast. People would find a house that they wanted, but couldn't instantly qualify for. To solve this they would agree to lease the house with the option to purchase. They would put down a large security deposit that went towards the purchase of the home once they were able to qualify for financing to buy the home. Lease w/ option to purchase. Two separate agreements. If they failed to qualify within the agreed upon lease period then the home could be sold and the buyers would lose their security deposit.

There are creative ways to use this solution. It would be best for you to research this solution to determine if you want to use it. There are gotchas.

Finally, don't use this like a crook. You'll lose a lot of money.

For me it depends on what their goal is. Do they care if they have to move or not? If they absolutely want to stay then wouldn't it best to buy out both notes and then do a lease /w option to purchase? (this is assuming they don't qualify to have both loans wrapped) They'd have a lower monthly payment and they'd be able to stay in their house.

If they don't care about keeping the house then they should straight sell the house as mentioned before.

Originally posted by @Linda Smith:

@Phillip Tillotson I totally understood what you were saying about the deal structure  Sadly, I think the biggest thing you learned here was how much you can trust a friend. That sounds terrible but he agreed to the plan of putting himself in business with you as a GC knowing he could not fulfill it. Maybe he planned to hire a crew and mostly supervise and orchestrate, but I am guessing you would have included that if that were the case.

 That's a pretty spot on assessment. The contract outlined that if there was work he couldn't do then I could hire somebody else. I didn't know I'd have to do that on every deal. He didn't mention hiring others.

Worst part is that I thought I had this deal sunk. I told all my friends who follow what I do. Once it fell through I got to tell all the same people what happened. (I know. Don't spend the check before it is signed. I was excited!!)

I'm going to continue to save money and talk real estate until I can find the next deal. Hopefully I have better luck on the next one.

Originally posted by @Karen Margrave:

@Phillip Tillotson

 The devil is in the details, and that's why when you put something on here for people to comment, it's important to give all the details that are pertinent to the deal. I was going off what you stated, and with the information in your post, it seemed pretty one sided. 

Now looking at the rest of the details, I can see where it could have turned into a hot mess, and you're both probably lucky it didn't come together, just way too many parts to the puzzle. Just my .02. 

It is definitely not a simple deal. I was lucky to have one of the smartest and most experienced mentors in the nation helping though. As stated before, my only fear was the financial crunch until the house was sold.

Originally posted by @Karen Margrave:

@Phillip Tillotson  I can see why he bolted. Unless I totally missed something, your scenario makes no sense, and is structured to benefit one person, you. 

It's his house. You want him to sell it to you for a substantial discount, then you want to use his house to get a loan using a minimal amount of the money to invest back into the property that would be securing the loan. You encumber the property apparently for enough to give you $80,000 (you aren't really clear on this part), giving you  the ability to spend the money from HIS EQUITY and his security, on your deals. As if that's not bad enough, you think you're being generous by allowing him to work on the house? Also, on the $350, how long was he going to receive that? What if the house didn't sell? 

What experience do you have that he should have trusted you with what obviously is his only asset? What protections were there for the seller? I'll tell you, none.

I think it was a TERRIBLE idea. There's many ways you could have worked with the seller to put a deal together that could have been beneficial to both of you, but your deal missed the mark on every point from what I see. 

Karen,

His goal was to avoid taxes, pay off debts, buy a vehicle, and get a job without getting help from his father.

He was getting 10k$ up front to pay off debts, buy a vehicle, and do whatever else he needed. He would be staying at my house until we started doing well with real estate.

The job spelled out in the contract was that he would get paid to do renovations. I had planned to make it a formal LLC if it looked like we were doing good. Also, I had planned to split profits. This means that he would be getting interest from the 80k$ that I discuss below, pay for renovation work, and profits from the real estate deal. This would all be negotiated on a per deal basis unless a formal LLC was created.

We avoided taxes by putting the majority of the sale in a note against MY house. We agreed to end this part of the agreement after 10 years. This means interest payments and then a balloon payment on the 10th year. My mentor had thoughts for minimizing taxes if we got to the 10 year point and he wanted to continue.

The 80k$ would have gone in an escrow account. I (or llc if we formed one) would have to pay interest on the 80k$. I (or llc) would be allowed to borrow against the 80k$ for real estate investments. Anything over 5k$ would create a lien against the property that was purchased. If the money was not being used then it would be placed in a FDIC insured bank. This means that at all times the seller had protection. If I messed up big enough then he'd get whatever property I purchased and MY HOUSE. I don't want to lose my house.

For the heck of it lets pretend that he accepted and he was done with real estate after the 10 years, or we both agreed to end it after whatever amount of time. He would get the 80k$ and would have to pay taxes then unless he re-invested it on his own. I knew this going in and hoped that we could be successful enough that he would want to continue to work with me.

Please keep in mind that I didn't include every detail of everything so that I could try to keep this short. If you have questions about something that I didn't include then please ask. Don't assume that I was trying to screw the guy. I know him personally.

I understand that this deal may not make sense for people who have money or partners with money, lots of real estate knowledge, and/or lots of GC experience. However, if you are starting from scratch with nothing then you will need to take bigger risks to get started. Once I have real cash/experience to work with I will look for more traditional deals.

I would never have even thought of doing a deal like this if I didn't have such an experienced mentor assisting.

I would agree with your assessment if I didn't have such a smart/experienced person helping with the deal. 

Edit: also assuming the seller could perform. My only fear was the financial strain I'd have until we sold the house.