Hi BP Community,
I just offered on a property in Brooklyn, New York that is in the process of going through a full gut renovation and being flipped. The property is a two-family. It is off-market, so there is no competition. The seller is the renovator, and he is handling the flip personally. We estimate the flip is about 40-60% completed. The seller estimates he will be done in 2-3 months. The property looks promising, but there is still a lot of work to be done.
I would like to move forward and go under contract soon to lock the property down before other buyers enter the picture. But I also need to manage risk because my understanding is if I go under contract at this point, I would be buying the property "as is."
One way to manage risk is to create a comprehensive punch list to annex onto the contract, which provides for an itemized list of all renovations to be done. I would think that the seller would have some type of plan or blueprint, but my agent said this type of plan in writing isn't available. To make sure our punch list is comprehensive, we are thinking of organizing two inspections, one before going under contract and another inspection after all renovations are done. Then, in the contract, we would make closing subject to the inspection not uncovering any "material" defects in the house (not sure whether this clause is customary?).
So my question is: In this situation, what is the best way to manage risk in going under contract on a property that is in the middle of a full gut renovation?
I want to make sure that if I go under contract while only 50-60% of the renovations are completed that I ultimately get a finished product without any major defects. I also want to limit the seller from cutting corners on the renovation.
Thoughts?