Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: William C.

William C. has started 19 posts and replied 57 times.

Quote from @Lynn McGeein:

@Nathaniel C. Can’t you just provide your insurance company with tenant’s renters insurance policy info and allow insurance companies to hash it out? I think it’s reasonable for tenant to pay deductible if it really was their fault, if that’s allowed by your policy, but seems weird to me that you could expect tenant to know hanging a picture in that one spot would cause a leak. If tenant was warned not to hang anything there without using those sticky wall hangers, or if they used something not meant for home use, then maybe.


 Thanks for taking the time to weigh in. I am interested in being a part of the solution on this, so would love to hear more about your perspective on fault in this situation. Your opinion is the landlord would be at fault in this given situation?

Quote from @Nathan Gesner:

I would require the tenant to file the claim with their renters insurance.

If they don't have renters insurance, then I would file a claim with my insurance and the tenant would be responsible for reimbursing me for the deductible. 

If my insurance rejects the claim, then the tenant is responsible for the entire cost. I would allow a payment plan, but I won't spread the payments more than six months. A better option is for the tenant to take out a personal loan, pay me in full, and make payments to the bank.


 Thanks for taking the time to reply. This seems like a reasonable solution. I am leaning towards attempting something along these lines. In the end I just want it to be fair for both parties. I think that gives us a good chance at tenant retention. With this being a high rent home and them being solid tenants, that is something we must keep in mind (but also not allow us to act foolishly in the name of retention).

Quote from @Laura Stayton:
Quote from @Scott Mac:

If you collect the 10K from the renter will you reimburse that 10K to the insurance company?

To me it seems like you've been paid already, and are these the type of renter you can collect 10K from?

If they had 10K they'd probably buy a house- most renters are poor.

Would a court allow you to collect twice- make a windfall profit on this mistake in renter judgment?

Just my 2 cents.


 This is a good point and not one I thought of.  If payment has been received from the insurance company there's nothing to collect.  The time to get tenant insurance involved (if they have it, we require it) would be before the claim is filed.

Thank you. Sloppy language by me. Insurance claim has NOT been paid. We have a duty to mitigate damages. So we moved forward with the claim and a mitigation company to address the damage.
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Nathaniel C.

I assume you have put them on notice. Did you also notify their renters insurance?

If you collected an insurance claim you would only be able to collect your out of pocket (ie deductible).

I would absolutely collect that from them if they were properly notified

Can you define what you mean by notice?


If insurance approves the claim, I figure having the tenants cover the deductible would be fair.
 

Quote from @Scott Mac:

If you collect the 10K from the renter will you reimburse that 10K to the insurance company?

To me it seems like you've been paid already, and are these the type of renter you can collect 10K from?

If they had 10K they'd probably buy a house- most renters are poor.

Would a court allow you to collect twice- make a windfall profit on this mistake in renter judgment?

Just my 2 cents.

More context on my end, the insurance claim has been made but has been paid yet. There is always a possibility of denial.

In no way am I trying to double dip. Looking for advice on how others would handle this issue with the tenants. Thanks.

We own a SFH long-term rental. We self-manage. We have good tenants in there entering year 2 of a 2 year lease. One of the tenants hung a picture on a wall, puncturing a water pipe. There was a leak and about $10k in water damage done. I filed an insurance claim on our landlord insurance and got a remediation team in there immediately to stop the damage. The tenants are clearly responsible here. How would you all handle this? I can provide additional info as needed. Thanks for considering.

Quote from @Ashish Acharya:

@William C. This can go so many ways depending on so many factors.

1031 cannot defer cost seg deprecation recapture (only straight-line depreciation).

This needs to be modeled out with 1031 or outright sale and recapture percentage.

This post does not create a CPA-Client relationship. The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon. Readers should seek professional advice.


 Thanks for the reply @Ashish Acharya. Can you talk a little more about this? Specifically the part about a 1031 not deferring the recapture from the cost seg study, only straight line depreciation. My uninformed opinion was that 1031 allowed for the deferral and transfer to the new property.

Quote from @Pat Aboukhaled:

@William C. that's a great question and it shows you're planning smart by thinking ahead about the tax implications. I've worked with a lot of investors who’ve done cost segregation, and the recapture part is always something that can catch you off guard if you don't think it through.

Let’s break this down step by step..just like when I helped a buddy of mine who had a similar situation a couple of years ago, only he was dealing with a multi-family unit, not a single-family home. The math won't be exact since I’m just a Realtor (licensed in Arizona and a couple of other states) and not a CPA, but I can definitely give you a rough scenario from what I’ve seen.

1. Initial Depreciation:
You mentioned a cost segregation study that resulted in $80k of passive losses. This means you accelerated a lot of the depreciation upfront.  residential real estate is depreciated over 27.5 years, but since you took the bonus depreciation, you pulled a lot of it into the first year.

2. Depreciation Recapture:
When you sell, the IRS wants some of that depreciation back. Depreciation recapture on real estate is taxed at a flat 25%. So, if you claimed $80k in depreciation over the years (even if a chunk was in year one due to bonus depreciation), you’d owe recapture taxes on that.

Let’s run a basic example:

  • $80k depreciation recapture @ 25% = $20k in taxes.

3. Capital Gains:
Now, you bought the property for $700k and put in $25k in renos, so your adjusted basis is $725k. If you sell it for $800k, you have a capital gain of $75k ($800k - $725k).

Capital gains taz is usually lower than ordinary income tax, but since you don’t qualify for the 2 out of 5-year exemption, you’re looking at paying full capital gains taxes. Based on your personal tax rate of 30%, this would be:

  • $75k gain @ 30% = $22.5k in taxes.

4. Total Tax Liability:
So, you’re looking at a total tax bill of $20k (recapture) + $22.5k (capital gains) = $42.5k.

Funny thing is, I had a client back in Phoenix who was in almost the exact same situation. He was debating whether to sell or roll into a 1031, and it took us a couple of long coffee chats to weigh the pros and cons. He ended up going the 1031 route and hasn’t looked back since.

Another like-kind propert could really help you keep your momentum going without taking such a tax hit all at once. I’ve worked with folks in both Austin and Scottsdale who did just that and continued to build cash flow over the years.

So while the recapture and capital gains can hit hard, there are options to consider. I’d definitely recommend talking to a CPA who can run your exact numbers and make sure you're thinking of all the angles. Good luck, Nathaniel! It’s smart you’re thinking about this now instead of scrambling when it’s time to sell. 

Pat / Jasper
Turning investment visions into reality in Phoenix, AZ - Ranked #1 for residential real estate growth and opportunity by PwC


 Thanks for taking the time for the thoughtful reply with examples! Really helps us visualize. For us this is simply about knowing our options. A sale would be our last option and given the potential tax hit, one we plan to avoid. We have planned our financials carefully and are in a good position to buy and hold this one for a long time. Thank you so much.

Quote from @Account Closed:

Hey Nathaniel, 

In this scenario, when selling the property for $800k, depreciation recapture would be a key consideration. The cost basis is the $700k purchase price plus $25k in renovations, totaling $725k. The cost segregation study generated $80k in passive losses, meaning a portion of that would be recaptured as ordinary income (at a 25% federal rate). The difference between the sales price ($800k) and the adjusted cost basis ($725k minus $80k of accelerated depreciation) is $155k. The $80k of depreciation recapture will be taxed at 25%, and the remaining $75k capital gain will be taxed at the capital gains rate (likely 15-20%). Your combined personal tax rate of 30% could apply to state and federal taxes depending on jurisdiction. A 1031 exchange could defer both capital gains and depreciation recapture taxes if you reinvest in another like-kind property. Depending on if this is your primary residence or not can alter the strategy but that's the gist 


 This is great (and fast!). Thanks for taking the time. Not a personal residence for us. We like having a full handle on all scenarios. #1 we aim to buy and hold forever. #2 we like the future potential for 1031. #3 would be selling the property and taking the tax hit. This could happen in an emergency scenario so it is good to know what the numbers look like.

How do you account for depreciation from the cost seg that was offset by rental income cash flow over time?

In the event of a sale, are you able to subtract realtor fees and other sale fees from the net gain of the sale?

Can anyone quickly share a math model of a the depreciation recapture scenario below? Thanks in advance for considering.

Purchased a home for $700k

Completed $25k in renovations

Completed a cost seg study (80% bonus) that resulted in $80k in passive losses for that tax year

What if we now sold that property for $800k. Home would have been held for 5 years total. We are not eligible for capital gains sheltering under the 2 out of the last 5 years rule. We have a combined personal tax rate of 30%. What would a taxation model look like in this scenario? We are over planners and want to know what type of restraints we have put on our exit routes. Ideally we hold forever (cash flow positive) or we 1031 to another property.

Thanks in advance. Let me know what other details are needed to answer fully.