@Account Closed That’s funny because the opposite is true: I assume nothing.
My tax professional read the IRS regulations and examined case law. He also assumes nothing. While it’s becoming more common to audit tax filers on this particular aspect of the tax code it is still not too common or understood by even the seasoned IRS auditors, let alone the new 89,000 employees.
“But, no worries, since you state "You are absolutely correct" you must have done the research and read the supporting case law and been in tax court to know what they do and don't do. I defer to your brilliance and experience. Will you be doing seminars?”
Yes I did.
Yes I did.
Called out on it by IRS and NY State Dept of Taxation, provided my documentation and cited the code to both entities, which resulted in avoiding tax court and a reversal of tax liabilities. In fact, one auditor even told me he was unfamiliar with it until he read my references.
My husband thinks I am both brilliant and experienced.
No.
Said gently:)