Hi Michele,
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, my vacancy estimate, like other parts of my worksheet, are overly conservative - which, I guess, makes the deal look marginal. My goal in doing that is to not lose money by unexpected expenses.
The insurance in upstate NY is out of control since two major storms (Irene, Sandy) hit in recent years. My personal residence has seen a 45% increase in premium over the last two years, and believe me I have shopped around! One of the many great reasons to leave NYS, in my opinion. But, I digress...
The insurance broker I will probably use charges a 40% premium for a circuit panel with fuses (which this property has). I plan on upgrading it, but left in the higher premium in the meantime.
The mortgage rate was accurate as of a month ago, but rates have risen since then, so no - the debt service is probably low on the worksheet.
The street is posted at 30 mph, and is a typical "city street", yet it is getting more use these days with chib fab plant up the road. There is not much of a front yard, but has a very nice back yard.
Regarding "rentable features" - it needs a bit of upgrading (see OP), but it is probably close to par for the course. My idea was to make it a BIT nicer than others, as the vacancy average in the city is around 9%.
Floor plan isn't non-traditional; one unit's kitchen does not have any countertops or cabinets, just a built in hutch for dishes. The tenant uses the kitchen table as a counter, I guess! I've planned for that update in my rehab costs.
And yes, I was thinking of totally throwing a low-ball number that would work, all things considered. Which I may do, but I think I am going to hold for a bit and let the seller come back down to reality. In the meantime, we may begin working with a realtor and looking for some larger (5+) multi-unit properties and see where that leads.
Please accept my continued gratitude for your past and future input!