I appreciate the advice, but is that not the purpose of public forum, I am not trying to win the case I am trying to get some ideas as to what people think about this issue, and to be honest I am appalled by the responses, but that is a slap in my face and no one else’s.
And second I have a good lawyer it just floors me that I have had to do so. I am just very curious as to what the general public thinks about this so called "political" perspective, is this not exactly that? I am angry and speaking out about the laws that are in place by our government that limits my free speech regarding a company that acts under a highly regulated governmental eye, hence a brokerage. Therefore my thoughts regardless of where they are being heard are as an example being used "govern done me wrong" and while I understand that I can't "force" people to listen apparently they are, which is great.
So . . . . in a long winded response I disagree that Freedom of Speech is a misconception of the general public and would go as far to say that the misconception is those that read too literally into the amendment, the amendment was written very vaguely because when written they realized that the world is ever changing and therefore needed to write these amendments with much interpretation needed. Keep in mind the goal of the amendments was not to limit the rights of the citizens but limit the rights of the government, therefore all interpretations should be viewed in the context of freedom not taking it away.