Happy weekend BP members,
So I'm not the type of person that's afraid to admit when I am wrong, and I'm begininng to feel that way. In answer to @Craig Bellot, ... there is nothing about their agreements that scare me off. It's just that at first glance it seems like a lot of money to pay out of my profit and I was thinking that I could be more in control by hiring in house.
I'm not sure I am understanding @Jarrod Kohl. Are you saying that it would be more expensive to hire an in house PM or more expensive to hire a PM company?
And as for @Peter VanWesep, I love your attitude, If Iknew of a property management company that was as confident as you (cheaper than everyone else and BETTER THAN THEM TO BOOT) I'd probably hire them tomorrow.
After reading @Matt K.'s reply, I began to quickly do some math. If I have a portfolio that generates 17000 in gross rent monthly, (17000 x 8% is 1360) That comes out to 16320 annually.
I have a full time job and manage my rentals, so I would estimate that it should take less than twenty hours a week for a part time assisstant. At 16320 annually that's about 15.70 an hour. So I'm wondering... does the employees at a property management company that would be taking care of my properties make more that that? I don't know. And could I train a 15 dollar an hour assisstant to manage my rentals? I don't know. Would it be legal? I don't know.
I think I'm leaning towards Jarrod's idea of trying out a PM co. for a few properties to see how it works out.
Any other thoughts are always welcome and appreciated :)
Thank you everyone
Wishing everyone loads of success,
Mark