Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Will Sifert

Will Sifert has started 48 posts and replied 510 times.

Quote from @Abdenour Achab:

Thank you all for chiming in.

@Will Sifert, here is a brief description of the foreclosure process in Arizona:

@Chris Brevik, I am not going to ask the county treasurer's staff as I suspect they know the generic stuff (such as waiting three years after the lien on the property was first brought to sale), but not the nuances about whether or not one is allowed to mail notices 6 to 7 weeks before the expiration of the 3 years redemption period.

I have read once in an internet forum than one investor got fined $200 per contact after he sent mass mailing to many owners before the expiration of the redemption period. If I remember correctly, the state was Missouri. Hence my concern and the original question in the forum. But I am only going to contact two homeowners. So, even if that ends up being a seminar for me, it won't be an expensive one.

@Jerry K., I have never actually foreclosed on a tax lien in Arizona. Not on my own. Not using an attorney. But I did follow, in 2020, what you recommended: I had an attorney send out the mailings for two property owners. His assistant sent me copies of the mailings. And I have mastered the Monkey See Monkey Do technique.

I plan to do the mailings for two homeowners ASAP after January 1, 2024. I will update the thread if I find out anything about whether:

A) There is any penalty for contacting the homeowners before the expiration of the redemption period.

B) My lawyer accepts to use my mailing(s) as a starting point.

C) If my lawyer decides to re-do the mailings himself, whether that's because I sent them before the expiration of the redemption period, for another reason, or for both reasons.


I've read the Arizona state statutes a few times but it has been a while and I don't remember off hand. There is a lot of information there that will tell you exactly what needs to be done as far as when to send out the notices. Yes, some states you are not allowed to contact the owner during the redemption period, some you are suppose to and some it doesn't matter either way.... varies greatly from state to state.
Quote from @Abdenour Achab:

I own two tax lien certificates in an Arizona county for which the three year redemption period will end in February 2024. My plan is the following:

1) Send the the 30 day Notice to Foreclose on my own.

2) Try to locate and contact the owners on my own to remind them to redeem the property or, in the alternative, deed it to me for dirt cheap, subject to the tax lien.

3) If either property remains unredeemed and not deeded to me after some TBD date in the first half of 2024, ask my lawyer to start the foreclosure on it.

What happens if I send the 30 day Notices on January 1, 2024, notifying them of my intent to start foreclosure "on or after March 1, 2024"? Would that enable my lawyer to start the foreclosure process, if need be, any time between March 1, 2024 and July 1, 2024? Or does the 30 day notice need to be sent AFTER the expiration of the redemption period in order to be effective?


 Please let us know how it goes I will be in the same situation in another year with some tax liens.  I haven't been investing in AZ long enough to know the judicial foreclosure process well yet. 

Post: refuse to pay the subsequent tax in Louisiana

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Garret Broussard:

Lots of good info in this post - thanks guys! Still in learning curve experimenting with a few of these in Louisiana (@Will Sifert). A few related questions:

1) If I do pay subsequent years taxes and the owner does end up redeeming in <3 years, I do get that subsequent years “investments” back with interest, right? In other words, I’m not just paying it to protect my original investment - I’m paying it to invest more $ at a good interest rate in the event of redemption. It only makes sense, but I haven’t found that written clearly anywhere official. I see that I’m now listed as the “Taxpayer” on the sheriff’s website, but there’s nothing on the tax lien certificate itself that says I’ll get interest on subsequent years taxes/investments in the event of owner redemption. 

2) Anything special that I’m supposed to do when I go to pay the subsequent taxes to make sure it’s clear that I’m paying it as a part of a tax lien investment? I could pay all of the 2023 taxes online right now, but there’s nothing online that makes any distinction between the taxes I owe on my personal home and the “taxes I owe” on my tax lien investments. 

3) After paying the taxes each year, should I expect any kind of document confirming my new “lien balance” now that I’ve paid another years taxes?  I’m assuming that the owner now has to pay more to redeem now that I have paid more taxes on their property but trying to confirm that. 

For example, I bought a 2022 tax lien. I do want to protect my interest but I would hate to pay the 2023 and 2024 taxes, then learn in 2025 that the owner redeeemed and I get the 2022 investment +5% +1%/month, but lose my 2023 and 2024 tax payments because I did something wrong or misunderstood my investment when a I paid those subsequent taxes. 

Thanks for taking the time to read this far, and thanks in advanced for any replies. 



1.  Absolutely, You will get back the subsequent property taxes you paid with interest (1% per month). It is mentioned in the state statutes "
*By law your taxes are delinquent after December thirty-first. The law
requires interest be charged as follows: A flat rate of one percent (1%)
per month on delinquent ad valorem taxes. "   The 1% is for any delinquent taxes owed, so not just the amount sold at tax sale but all future amounts. The owner can technically pay the sub tax without redeeming the property. Really no advantage for them to do that other that to save some money on interest if they had enough to pay the tax bill but not redeem at that time. Sometimes they do this by accident or didn't realize there was a tax sale. Every now and again when I go to pay the subsequent taxes one or two will have been paid, but not redeemed.

2. Make sure the property hasn't been redeemed before you pay the current tax bill. It takes some parishes weeks even months to send you a redemption check. It takes some of them weeks to update their online records to show that a redemption has been made. So in most cases it's impossible for you to know without asking if the property has been redeemed recently or even that day. If the property has been redeemed and you pay the current tax bill owed you legally have no right to get your money back. Anyone can pay anyone else's tax bill. Most parishes would refund it to you but you can't count on that. Always let them know you are the tax sale buyer and you are paying the current years taxes owed and ask them to make sure that none of the properties have been redeemed. They would see if that was the case in their computer.   ALSO this is a good time to further investigate the property, do a title search on your own if you haven't already done so. Make sure its a good property that you would want to own before you continue to throw more money at it.

3. No you will not receive any type of update. When they go to redeem the sheriff's office will require them to pay you back on everything including interest. If they can not produce 100% of what is owed, they will not allow them to make the redemption. Other thing to note, once the redemption period expires, it doesn't continue to collect interest. At that point the sheriff's office will turn them away if they come to redeem / pay and tell them to contact you. Then it becomes a negotiating game or you get an attorney and file suit to take ownership.

Post: Property on Tax Sale has ~half of a structure

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Jack Raine:

Check this out:

 https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/111-Albion-St-Savannah-GA...

The majority of the structure is on the lot, 111 Albion, but it spans into the adjacent lot. This is up for Tax auction this week. How much of a headache is this?

 If this is legitimately one of the rare cases where someone built a house on someone else's property this would likely be resolved by adverse possession.  The house looks older than 20 years. In GA adverse possession is 20 years. So the owner of the house could hire an attorney and file a lawsuit to take legal ownership of the portion of the neighboring lot that his house is on / fenced, if the house has been there for over 20 years. Looks like it would only take about 20-30' from the vacant lot. You could also buy the lot and sell the owner of the house that portion for an amount that is less than what he would pay in legal costs... that would be a win win. 

Post: Property on Tax Sale has ~half of a structure

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Jack Raine:
Quote from @Richard Elvin:

Here's the record card, if the link works. It's just a lot, no house.
https://www.chathamtax.org/PT/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin...

So, fun update: GIS also makes it pretty clear that the property line "definitely" through the adjacent lot's structure - one might even say the majority of the "adjacent" lots structure is on 111 albion lot. I did drive it, the notice sign was placed in the appropriate lot. So you would definitely be purchasing the deed to a disputed property - I'd feel confident saying, at the very least, a buyer intending to clear the title would eventually be conceding a large portion (if you consider set backs etc) to the property owner of the structure - I am 100% talking out of my *** with that statement though, I'm not a real estate lawyer and only the most vanilla/conventional of real estate investors (that is to say green/inexperienced).  

Here's the fun part! I stuck around at the auction to see this property's bid. The owner occupants of the adjacent property showed up to the auction to buy the deed. The county allowed them to make an announcement requesting that no one bid against them as they have tried to buy the property for many years simply to clear up the property dispute. Auctioneer followed up with "this is not a chill on your auction. Everyone here has the legal right to bid on it. But everyone ought to know the property line goes through their living room". No one bid against them.


The rest of the auction was pretty wild. Probably 100+ paddles, bids that seemed pretty exorbitant for most properties, and I got to see the "land bank shenanigans" first hand - even spoke to the commissioner about it who was vocally opposed to their presence; she apparently attends the bank's board meetings to protest their operation.


 Send me a link where you are seeing this. It’s not impossible but 99 out of 100 times the lines are wrong or you are doing something wrong vs some one built a house half on someone else’s property. 

Post: Property on Tax Sale has ~half of a structure

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Jack Raine:
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

@Jack Raine

How do you know this? Did you have a survey done?


 I did not. I just looked at lot line overlays. It's not "close" its pretty egregious.

....can "anyone" get a survey done of a parcel? This is a tax sale. 

 Welcome to real estate investing.  The line overlay is wrong more often than not. Looking at the picture on Zillow I don’t see anything that sticks out as being wrong  with the property line. Pretty good chance “half the structure “ is not on the lot next door. 

Quote from @Bruce Lynn:

For the dirt-cheap price of $4.9 million, McMachen bought all 645 tax-foreclosed properties in the county, including 403 residential properties in 2012.   What did he do with all those?   Did he make any money?   Does he still have them or the land/lots?   Spent $4.9million at the tax sale, so average $7600 per property.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bill-mcmachen-macomb-county_n_1739062


Cliff hanger..... I thought the article you linked to would tell us how it turned out lol  

Post: Buying My First Tax Deed

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @James McGovern:

Tax Deeds in Connecticut are often overpriced and a newbie will lose their shirt pursuing them.


Insert any state name where "Connecticut" is in that statement.  

There are no easy investments. None. There is nothing out there you can just start doing with little to no experience or knowledge and be successful at it. Maybe get lucky once but you will ultimately lose. Educate yourself as much as possible, then start very slow, learn from your mistakes but make them small mistakes. Once you get a much better understanding and have some wins, then increase your investing.

Some people do very well from different types of investments because they are very experienced and knowledgeable. This enables them to avoid most mistakes, know exactly what to look for and to have specialized techniques or angles that they know first hand that it works and they focus on that. None of that is going to be known by someone who is new or just starting off. Much of this comes from experience and knowledge of the area.

Post: Looking to Connect with Tax Lien Investors

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Bryan Moynihan:

@Will Sifert Thanks Will.  I'm open to buying tax liens in CO, but I understand there is a significant amount of state by state nuance, so I guess the full answer is that I'm not sure yet - I have more work to do to fully understand whether CO is a good or bad state to buy them in.  My understanding is that CO is basically middle of the road.  

Would it be possible to paste a link to your post?  I looked through your posts, but I'm not exactly sure which one you're talking about.

There really is no good or bad state to invest in, it really depends on what your investment strategy is. Are you looking to primarily make money from the interest or you trying to acquire the property.  Its always best to invest where you live unless your state goes against your investment strategy. Even then, I would still try to make it work where you live. It's so much easier when you know the areas very well and you can go in person to auctions, drive by properties etc.

I was able to figure it out, here is the link to the post:

If you are to buying tax liens and need help getting started.... 


Post: Looking to Connect with Tax Lien Investors

Will SifertPosted
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
  • Posts 517
  • Votes 316
Quote from @Bryan Moynihan:

Hi - Hoping to connect with a few people that are experienced in investing in Tax Liens.  I'm considering getting into that realm, and looking for some guidance on the best way to start out.  

Please reach out to connect and chat!

Thanks, 

Bryan

Strange it wont let me copy and paste one of my posts here. I made a post a few weeks ago about how to get started. Check that out for a step by step list to get you going in the right direction.