Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kyle Smith

Kyle Smith has started 23 posts and replied 215 times.

Post: Indoor pool flooring

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @John Underwood:

Stamped concrete doesn't have grout.  That should be very durable.

I guess I mean the grooves in the concrete have the potential to hold water. 

Post: Indoor pool flooring

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104

I’m currently building a pool cabin in Gatlinburg and I’m interested in some opinions regarding indoor pool flooring options.  I will be pouring the pool floor next week and I had originally considered stamped concrete but now I’m sorta second guessing myself.  I got to thinking the stamped concrete may hold water and water may stay in the grout lines or cracks in the concrete causing potential mildew, mold etc. 
Has anyone considered epoxy flooring with a nonslip surface or what other options should I consider?  Thoughts?
Thanks in advance

Post: Movie Mansion - Smokies STR

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104

Ah yeah, the movie mansion. Nice. I thought about doing the same thing when I saw that listing. Glad you pulled the trigger and I think you will do well with the upgrades. That chalet has a theme which will set it apart from the rest. Very cool.

I was going to go all out on the movie theme. Put in a huge projection screen and a big sound system and bill it at as the best movie experience in the smokys.   The moment they walk in it feels like a movie theater… but a luxury feel with movie memorabilia everywhere for an in-depth experience.  From what I hear, themed properties are killing it these days.   Either way, I think you’ll do well.
  

Post: Private lenders for new construction in smoky mountains

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104

Hard money private lenders can readily be found here on bigger pockets.  I’m not sure if I would go that route but I’m unsure of your financial situation.  It’s a risky proposition right now because due to the current market  your appraised value could come in lower than what you have in it.  Hard to believe we are saying that right now about he smokys but it isn’t beyond the realm of possibility.

I’m not sure how much market analysis you have done, but cabins in this area could possibly be approaching some saturation levels. If the cabins you build are cookie cutter, non-mountain view cabins then there would be some risks there in my opinion.  It’s a wait and see game for me unless I find the perfect lot or plat of land with a stellar view at a fairly low price.  If you are literally on the city limit fringe, say within 5 mins of the pigeon forge or gatlinburg strip, you may be okay without a view. 

Lenders in the area know the market very well. If it’s a good investment for the bank you will have success. However, many have raised the down payments to 25%. They also require a large chunk of contingency money in your account at their bank. They have gotten ridiculous with their investment loan requirements.   It being a recession year is also a challenge. The local banks saw this coming before anyone else did and they remember 2008-9. Also, they know over 1000 home permits were issued in the fiscal year this year and a majority were for rental cabins.   

I never thought saturation would be an issue, but the Gat/PF rental gold rush has brought many out of state and international investors.   It’s taking 1-2 years to build. Materials are in short supply and many of these cabins were built to accommodate COVID year occupancies.  We are reverting now back down to more reasonable numbers similar to 2019, then add the new cabins online.  It’s a wait and see for many local investors I know. 

Post: Short Term Rental Cabin in the Smoky Mountains, TN

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @Nathan W.:
Quote from @Kyle Smith:

Wow, that’s a great investment. You did it right!  The streets of Gatlinburg during peak summer was nothing like last year. If the traffic is any indication I would say there’s been a big drop in vacationers in PF/Gat this year. Several factors for that but they’ll be back.  I figure this year and next will be tough with lower rental numbers but it should creep back up.  


The park numbers are lower, but not by much. They just reported June numbers and the drop was less than 4% https://irma.nps.gov/STATS/SSR...
I know park visitors are not the same as people staying overnight in cabins but there is a strong connection between the two. 

Thanks for the info. I’m surprised by those numbers. That’s great!



Post: Short Term Rental Cabin in the Smoky Mountains, TN

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104

Wow, that’s a great investment. You did it right!  The streets of Gatlinburg during peak summer was nothing like last year. If the traffic is any indication I would say there’s been a big drop in vacationers in PF/Gat this year. Several factors for that but they’ll be back.  I figure this year and next will be tough with lower rental numbers but it should creep back up.  

Post: Buying STR in Smoky Mountains

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @Collin Hays:
Quote from @Jon Tungsten:
Quote from @Collin Hays:

Another data point...while you wait a year from prices to fall 10 percent (if they do), you've probably given up that much, or more, in lost revenue while you stood on the sidelines.  So unless you expect prices to fall substantially, it's probably a zero sum game. 

@Collin Hays are you not expecting a greater than a 10 percent drop in prices in your market?

No one knows what the real estate market looks like a year from now, two years from now, or even ten years from now.  That's the stuff of casinos.  And I am really not worried about it, as I am holding long term.  My point was that, for every year you wait on prices to go down, you've given up income.  You can make a really poor buying decision and still come out way ahead:

In 2005, I gave $240K for a cabin in Cosby and my neighbors thought I had lost my mind.  Then the financial crisis hit, and the cabin value dropped to $150K-ish.  But I didn't sell so it didn't matter to me.  Over 15 years, it's produced over $600,000 in rental revenue, and is now worth at least $750,000.  And while I was negative cash flow in the early years, that's sofa change compared to the gains.

Find a real estate investment that you believe in for the long term, buy, and hold. 

Good advice here… thanks Collin

Post: 50/50 Partnerships for STRs

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @Chris Martin:

In most states, an LLC is a sensible structure for an operating company. The 1065 K-1 (Part II) identifies the Profit/Loss/Capital percentages owned by the partners, and you can adjust these items to tailor the P/L/C to the particular operation. Someone with tax experience can chime in, but the LLC can (based on the LLC Operating Agreement) dole out profits and losses however the members agree. In my experience we have also had LLCs as partners/owners, which allows (in NC at least*) an easy way to add or remove people's investment dollars into/out of the operation.

Here is a real-life example of a project I put together. I'll call the Operating company LLC-O. LLC-O is owned by two 50% capital owners, LLC-A and LLC-B. LLC-A has three members now, two when it organized in 2017. LLC-B has three members now, four when it started... and only one founding member from LLC-B is still a member. The membership transactions in LLC-A are completely independent of the membership transactions of LLC-B, and further the changes have absolutely no bearing on the Operating company (LLC-O) or its taxes.

*NC General Statutes 57D-5-01: Article 5, Transfer of Ownership Interests; An ownership interest is personal property. 

Really great explanation here especially with the example company, thanks. I had read something about structuring LLCs in this manner and it intrigued me, but to be honest it flew over my head.  I’m convinced now I need to do this through a LLC.  I’m going to spend some quality time researching this. Thanks

Post: 50/50 Partnerships for STRs

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @Scott Trench:

This is certainly possible. There are some good cautions on this thread, and you should definitely consider it like a marriage - and get a prenup - if you do this. I believe your question was specifically about planning for exit. 

One simple way to plan for a potential long-term breakup is the "shotgun clause".

A shotgun clause will essentially allow either partner to exit at any time. And the mechanism is a buyout. 

For example, if your partner wants out, they can offer to buy you out at a $500,000 valuation. 

If you felt that the $500,000 valuation was fair, you could sell your interest, and that's it. 

If you thought that $500,000 valuation was too low, you could buy them out at that price point, and that's it. 

This is a simple but potentially effective way to allow either party to exit at either time, and be prepared with a fair, firm offer. 

Of course, if you aren't in a practical position to buy out the partner, or can't find another partner, then their superior financial strength is an advantage. But, then again, in an arrangement like this, they are taking WAY more financial risk and real risk than you, and only getting 50% of the profits. 

I hope this was helpful!

Hi Scott, thanks for taking time to give such an informative reply. It sounds like I have a lot of research before I offer this idea to potential investors.  I definitely want to make it as fair as possible with mutual benefits for both parties.  I’ve been given a lot to think about here and I truly appreciate the insight. 

Post: 50/50 Partnerships for STRs

Kyle SmithPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Posts 216
  • Votes 104
Quote from @Kevin Luttrell:

@Kyle Smith this should probably be structured as a partnership LLC that owns the property with a detailed operating agreement spelling out all of these terms. Then there wouldn't be questions surrounding what he may or may not want to do with the property in the future - the LLC would own the property, not him.

Operating agreement could show 50/50 ownership of the LLC but with all capital and future appreciation belonging to your partner, all management/care/maintenance handled by you, net profit split 50/50, and decision to sell in the future must be agreed upon by both partners.

Ah yes, this makes perfect sense.  Thanks for the insight.