Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kim Hopkins

Kim Hopkins has started 48 posts and replied 254 times.

Post: Insurance Broker for Older Retail Center

Kim HopkinsPosted
  • Investor
  • Posts 255
  • Votes 73

As it so happens, we are asking for a seller discount, but do need insurance prior to close regardless. The current carrier said they reassessed b/c it's a new acquisition and declined. Many carriers are doing this as I know you're aware.

Post: Insurance Broker for Older Retail Center

Kim HopkinsPosted
  • Investor
  • Posts 255
  • Votes 73

@Jason Bott Do you want to try on this one with us? We are working with two other brokers, full disclosure, but we are still looking for a new broker in general for our book of business. 

Post: Insurance Broker for Older Retail Center

Kim HopkinsPosted
  • Investor
  • Posts 255
  • Votes 73
Quote from @Jason Bott:

@Kim Hopkins Unfortunately that is the state of the market, but there are still options out there.

To efficiently find alternative quotes, have your broker give you a complete list of carriers they approached.  You can give that list to other agents and ask if they have any insurance carrier not on that list who they can try.

As an example, we have 15 or so carriers interested in these buildings, but your broker probably only approached 5-10 of them.

The last thing you want to do is have 5 agents submitting your business to the same underwriters.  Agents and underwriters get frustrated and give up on the account.


 Thanks. Yes that's exactly what we're doing. But we're literally being declined by them all. What do owners do who have pubs as tenants? 

Post: Insurance Broker for Older Retail Center

Kim HopkinsPosted
  • Investor
  • Posts 255
  • Votes 73

Hello!

We're in contract to purchase a 20k sf retail center in Phoenix, built in 1976. It has 17 tenants, average 1,000 SF units. LL did major renovations - roof, some electrical, HVAC, store fronts, parking lot. The building is not sprinklered. 

We cannot get property insurance! Our insurance broker has been declined by ALL carriers b/c of either the pub or the age of the building. Everyone is citing a reduced appetite for properties over 30 years old. They all say it's a big issue as well that the building is not sprinklered. 

Does anyone have a referral for an insurance broker that specializes in finding standard carriers to insure this property type? 

Thank you!

Kim

Quote from @Ronald Rohde:
Quote from @Kim Hopkins:

LOL! @Greg Downey Well, I owe you all a drink, and my lawyer a nice $525 or whatever for the hour we wasted discussing this. According to the lender, they have no idea why it's an option to put an LLC as a guarantor and they've never had it approved. What a rabbit hole!

Our broker even said something about this being worse than personally guaranteeing because you would be essentially cross-collateralizing the properties. 

Back to signing over our house and our first born. J/k. I know they can't take the house. ;) 


 I think you just need more sophisticated vendors. Most of what you post could be answered offline, IMO someone with real access and data to your properties, rent rolls, your net worth, etc.


 What kind of vendors are you talking about? I think most of what I post is aimed towards other experienced real estate investors but would be happy to have "vendors" to go to offline if such existed... 

LOL! @Greg Downey Well, I owe you all a drink, and my lawyer a nice $525 or whatever for the hour we wasted discussing this. According to the lender, they have no idea why it's an option to put an LLC as a guarantor and they've never had it approved. What a rabbit hole!

Our broker even said something about this being worse than personally guaranteeing because you would be essentially cross-collateralizing the properties. 

Back to signing over our house and our first born. J/k. I know they can't take the house. ;) 

Quote from @Greg Downey:

@Sarah Downey might chime in here as she is our entity expert in the shop BUT I would ask your lender what EXACTLY they are referencing regarding the "guarantor". If this is simply on the loan applicaiton, I wouldn't consider that worth more than the paper it is written on. Here are the 3 things that it might mean....

This is a limited recourse loan - IE - recourse would be limited to the property AND anything owned within the LLC

This is a FULL recourse loan - IE - the loan can and will be made to your LLC BUT in the case of a default, the will take the property and if necessary reach into your personal assets.

This is NON-recourse loan (you have already identified that this is not the case) - Lender can only take the property in case of default

My guess is that this is a full recourse loan and you are reading MORE into the loan application than what will actually happen with the loan. IE - the LLC will be the borrower and YOU will be the guarantor. Certainly worth asking as you absolutely wan to know BUT I think that the question would be better aimed at the CU.


It's a full recourse loan but apparently an LLC can sometimes be the guarantor. Not the borrowing entity LLC.

FYI, we put this in the LOI and they signed without issue. I think a good broker will respect that a signed LOI means the offer should not be shopped provided all parties reasonably work diligently and quickly to arrive at a signed agreement. We're in contract now so all good. Thanks all!

Thanks all! We negotiated that we could refinance this property with this lender directly (no broker fee) but any other work (including with this lender) in the next 5 years goes through them. 

Yes, I agree we will likely go back to the broker to refinance anyways but this provides for the scenario when rates across the board are dramatically lower, in which case we can refinance with this lender hopefully easily with minimal fees. 

Either way, we intend to give this broker lots of business and I think this is a fair resolution for both. 

Thanks all!

Hello!

We are working with a credit union on a loan for a commercial property acquisition. The loan is full recourse. In the past, we've just listed ourselves as individuals (or maybe our trust, I forget) as the guarantor. 

This time, we noticed there is an option to list an LLC as a guarantor. This seems like it might be advantageous as it might add a layer of protection.

If that's the case, what sort of structure for the LLC would be best? Here's the LLCs we already have:

       • About 15 LLCs that each hold one individual property. I'm sure those are out since they each only have ownership in one property.
       • An asset management LLC that has no interest in any properties. That would be ideal for us but I'm guessing the lender wouldn't allow it since it doesn't have interest in any properties
      • A new holding company LLC but it only has an interest in one smaller property we bought last year (our GP interest). 

Are any of these good candidates? If not, is it worth it to set up a new LLC? Does it actually offer more protection? And if so, what ownership should it have?

Yes I know this is a question for my attorney who I've already asked, but he just said "generally the lender will want to see assets in the LLC" so I'm looking for answers here from experienced investors and their best practices. No, I do not consider this legal advice.

Thank you!

Kim