@Wes Blackwell
Thank you for the detailed response. I'm currently analyzing for practice to get used to the process and actually discover what's out there, and how the math is supposed to work. I was hoping for a general guideline to weed out properties faster, but for now, I'm pretty much just taking a listing from my realtor, running the numbers, trying to hammer my numbers down, and seeing how the Sacramento market actually plays out.
For example, one of my first properties I ran numbers through had a 0.6% cap rate, but I was factoring in 10% cap ex, repairs, and vacancy. That was a triplex with 20% down.
A quick Google search showed that Sacramento vacancy, on average, is 2.88%, so the next couple of "deals" I'll look at I'll use a 5% vacancy rate. Is this the right thinking for this? Property management needs to be included, whether I'm managing myself or not. (Which I'm definitely doing at the beginning. I can pay myself and turn around and reinvest into the company. )
I will be house hacking it, so I'd like to start with a triplex, minimum, but it's looking like I may have to turn to duplex or SFRs to get my foot in the door and work my way up. I've already been told by several lenders in my area that I can treat up to 4 units as residential, so I could even qualify for FHA loans at a ridiculously low down payment. I ran the numbers for 3.5% down and 20% down, and just the estimated mortgage payment had a $700 difference on one property, and a $600 difference on the second... So cash flowing an FHA funded 4plex in Sac is pretty much futile. Possible, legally, but futile from an investment standpoint.
My metric for a "good" first deal, is if on paper it could cash flow $50 per month. That seems like a decent starting point. If im looking at it the wrong way, please correct me, but an extra $50 per month seems like a solid, reasonable goal for me to attain as a new investor.
Again, thank you so much for the detailed reply