Hi Brandon. As the seller, you determine the commission you'll pay to your listing agent, and how much of that commission will go to the buyer's agent. I always remind my clients you get what you pay for. In my experience, listing agents agreeing to list below 2.5% will not do the job of a top agent, who recognizes their value and will likely expect compensation in the 2.5-3% range. These agents will provide enough value in sale price to make up for any increase in commission paid out. I always recommend my clients split the listing commissions 50/50 with the buyer's agent. The buyer's agent does a great deal of work finding properties for their clients and a fair market commission will attract the most buyer's agents and potential buyers. Getting your RE license is a big commitment of both time and money and you'd only be saving half the commission, as buyer's agent commission would still need to be paid. My recommendation that would most likely net you the greatest return is to offer no less than 5%, splitting it 2.5% to your listing agent and 2.5% buyers. In this market, many properties that are listed and not prepped, priced and marketed correctly are sitting for a long time, and ultimately earning the seller much less than if they'd selected an agent based on the value they bring in terms of pricing strategy, staging strategy (repairs, etc) and marketing strategy. On a side note: Totally agree with you on ABNB vs MF. Here in Scottsdale, we have a number of ABNB investors wanting to get out within a year of purchase due to underestimating the amount of time involved in managing their property. And PMs here typically charge 25%, which makes it challenging to cash flow. Best of luck and let us know what you decide.