@Jeff S. It's the "next wave" of screening rules I'm most worried about, as well as general trend. From what I can gather, landlords will not be able to decline applicants based on most criminal records, past evictions, and others as long as it was longer than 12 months ago. Personally, I feel that an applicant that was evicted 18 months ago is someone you couldn't pay me to accept. And thanks; I do consider myself a different breed of advisor. But I do feel like advisors get a bad rep amongst the real estate crowd. Fact of the matter is, the vast majority of folks out there want something 100% passive that will never cause them personal drama or time. RE is like a side business for most. I preach the owner occ FHA 4 plex to young folks, but almost nobody is interested due to the inconvenience and misaligned spousal goals.
@Mathew Wray Thanks for weighing in! I'm trying to decide which group I'm in. I avoided Portland as the path of least resistance, but now I'm being told that the "Portland rules" will be spread to all of Oregon. That was a shock to the system for sure. I have a hard time mentally processing how this will lead to much higher rents. I can obviously see rent control in NY, San Fran, etc and see they have super high rents, but I guess it's a chicken and the egg scenario; I don't know what preceeded what. I figure it may discourage rental house building...??
@Nathan Gesner I tend to agree, and that's the way I feel. The implementation of doing that is a challenge though. I'm fearful of a 1031 exchange into a market I don't know. I hear a LOT of people regretting this decision due to the time pressure. I will have a $250k+ tax bill if I can't pull that off. Speaking of me be grumpy about Oregon, they will shave another 10% off my gain and recapture. I am in the middle of selling one property though and just paying off my house with it (super unpopular move on BP I'm aware). That one was 25% tax free though. I guess that's my middle ground at the moment. Maybe I'll consider selling another in 2020.