Originally posted by @James DeRoest:
Originally posted by @Joe Kling:
@Brandon Sturgill
Why wouldn't I want that?
I'll bite, wholesalers are inflating pricing within the market. Why do I want that?
Wholesalers don't fulfill any purpose in the market. If there were no wholesalers, the property will still come to the market through realtors. They serve no function.
Realtors take 6%, wholesalers take what? Last one I did was 30%. Why was that in my interest?
In fact, I'd say that wholesalers are bad for sellers as well. There is no real discussion about the value of a property, not even an obligation to buy the property when it goes under contract. Most are totally misrepresenting themselves to sellers frankly.
And wholesalers are no more investors than Walmart is an investor in groceries.
James -
That goes to my point. If we can help wholesalers do their job better we'll all benefit. If we try to kick them out of the discussion, they'll still try to do the job but they'll do it poorly and won't fulfill their function.
You say that agents take 6% and wholesalers take 30%? We need wholesalers to understand that they're not building a long term sustainable business if they do this by offering "deals" at 80-90% of ARV.
I'd rather invest less of my time and money marketing to sellers and instead invest my time and money on the execution of the flip. If a wholesaler can get a property that's in rough condition to me for 50-60% of ARV even after their cut I'm better off than a realtor trying to get 100% of ARV by telling the owner that's what it's worth despite all of the repairs needed. Even if the wholesaler marked up their contract price by 30% - if they get it to me at 60% of ARV, I'm going to be dying to do business with that wholesaler because they're clearly brilliant at finding deals and locking them up and I now have a source of profitable deals.