Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Corey

John Corey has started 7 posts and replied 660 times.

Post: Is it smart to have your first investment be an apartment?

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Ruslan Kotelyanets:

@John Corey

A poor condition four plex in my area is 800k plus an additional 100k or more for repairs. That loan is massive for a residential property and I would probably never get approved for it. With the research I have done it has become clear that commercial loans have less red tape.

I have no idea why you think red tape is involved.

Think of it this way. You want a car and you want an expensive piece of office equipment for a business. Both where chosen because they offer good value for what you are doing. When it comes time to secure a loan for each, the what the lenders care about is very different. It is hard to compare the two.

A 4 unit building can be purchased by an owner occupant (OO) on OO terms and conditions. Potentially for a tiny down payment. The income from the three units will be a factor in the total income the person has available to pay the monthly mortgage. The risk of default is statistically lower for OO loans. The property would be the OO's home so they might be willing to pay more than they would if it was 'just an investment'. In some markets, the OO can live for free because the rent from the other 3 units covers all of the monthly costs associated with owning the property. When you sell an OO property some or all of the profit can be tax free.

For the commercial property, 5 units or more, the lender can not and will not make a loan based on OO criteria. The building has no premium as someone's home. It is a commercial property for all intensive purposes and the value is determined by discounting the net operating income (rents mines expenses). Commercial financing is generally higher than the cost of OO financing given the higher risk factor. In addition, the terms and conditions can be very different. Technically, a commercial loan can be called by the lender if the NOI drops. You need to check your loan agreement before signing. Expect there will be a restriction against you living in a unit.

So, my point in all of this is you can not easily compare one with the other. Apples and oranges? You need to do what is best for you. Just be careful about the details. I have seen people think a commercial loan works like a residential loan and get caught out when the lender calls the loan or takes other action.

Post: Risks by second lien when first lien has foreclosed on home

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Jeff Cichocki:

@Devin Bobulski, the foreclosure should wipe out the second. Excess funds typically go to the county/state unless the homeowner files for the surplus prior to the sherif sale.

What can a 2nd lien holder do so they have a valid claim to the excess? I seem to remember there is a way to file an action that puts them in line. It could be faulty memory. 

Post: Crowdstreet Blended Portfolio

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Lily S.:

Any existing investors in the Crowdstreet Blended Portfolio I-IV on the Pro Forum here? What's your experience so far? I'm considering investing in their fifth series and just began to dig into the diligence. Given the short-term track record these blended portfolios have had, wanted to see if anyone has experience as an LP in this product, or frankly, any other Crowdstreet's white-labeled vehicles. I've looked at the 3rd-party offerings on their platform for a while now, but don't have the time/focus to put together my own portfolio at this time. Appreciate any tips/insights!

 I have not used the platform or looked at the portfolio.

A word of caution. When an investor does not have the time to select investments, handing control to someone else can easily turn out badly. If that happens, principal is lost. So, it would be better to just leave the money in cash until there is time. Having invested for over 35 years, I have definitely had a number of people come to me asking what they can do now that they have lost their funds.

If we were talking the stock market, an index fund makes sense. It performs based on an external index (no picking) and the overheads are tiny. Real estate is not like that. REITs would be the closest so an index of REITs might perform closest to a passive index.

A fund or manually built index depends on the party picking. They blow hot and cold. I have worked at multiple investment banks and the odds that a picker will outperform over an extended period are very slim. That is why there are 'gods' everyone writes about when someone finds one (Warren Buffett even through he really buys companies).

Originally posted by @Amy Wan:

basically, you are offering a security when you have 2 or more passive investors. syndication just means "group investment"

Don't think I'm allow to post my own articles, but you can google "Why Private Money Investing in Real Estate Involves Securities Law" for a linked in article i wrote a while back. Not exactly on point but close enough.

Amy,

I like what you share. Happy to post your link for you.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-private-money-investing-real-estate-involves-law-wan-cipp-us/

To others. If you good the title Amy provided without the quotes, you will land on a different article by another author. No idea what that one says. I just know it comes up first.

Post: Making sure I don't run afoul of SEC?

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Eddie Starr:

Not sure if this is the proper forum to post this to; move if needed.

I was looking at the various rules, and as you may imagine, it's a little confusing. I was looking over Title II - IV, and some others.

What I'm wondering is, if I have a certain percentage of funds, say through a HML, would I still be subject to any SEC rules, for finding my remaining funds through a 3rd party?

I was told that since I would be doing a "partnership," or maybe a "JV," the SEC wasn't applicable. Others have said that even if I have that sort of situation (forming a partnership, or investing company, with multiple members), since I didn't previously know the people, and have an "established relationship," that I could run afoul. Still others have said if you know them for a set time (ranges from 30 - 90 days, or have "at least 3 contacts, between in person, phone, and/or virtual"), then that covers the "established relationship."

Then, there's the "it depends...it's complicated...there's not hard set rules..."

Can any experienced members, who've had to make sure they don't run afoul of SEC, give their 2 cents and their actual experiences?

Google 'sec howey test'. And speak with a securities attorney. The Howey test is from the 1930s so the information might be new to you and yet it is well established. Many real estate investors who start with SFR never realize that there are regulations for fund raising. Or, they only find out when they are contacted by the SEC.

Two lawyers have commented in the thread. Reach out to them. There are a few others who also contribute on BP. There is a reason they put time into BP posts. There are many RE investors who need legal advice on the topic. The lawyers are very generous with sharing so take advantage.

Originally posted by @Tony Lin:

One issue is I was offered to invest without any prior relationship to the sponsors in a 506b deal. The deal was already under contract and marketing materials presented during the initial call. 

Regarding whether the actions of the sponsorship group constitute a bad boy clause behavior will be something to dig in more detail. 

I liked Amy's response. Note that she is a lawyer in the securities area.

As to the merits of a lawsuit. You really need to speak with 1 or more lawyers to see what they think of the case as it stands. Before you have to commit a lot of money to actually filing an action. It could be throwing good money after bad. And time. 

There might even be others you can file against if they helped. Still, we are talking about a lawyer on the clock unless your case is so good they take on the work for no up front fee.

You are in business and this 'investment' might be a costly 'education'. Signing up for more 'education' has to be weight against the benefits. 

Post: Is it smart to have your first investment be an apartment?

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Ruslan Kotelyanets:

This has been extremely helpful!  I have considered doing small investments like a duplex, triplex, and even fourplex but they are priced very high in the area I live. It makes sense to invest into an apartment because of the price and the return they bring.  I am definitely not trying to test waters with both feet, this is a big venture for me and i am trying to learn as much as possible.  The feedback I have received has been amazing!  Thank you for everyone’s input!  

To somewhat duplicate a prior reply I posted, you will not be able to obtain owner occupied financing for 5 units or more. Hence the reason that 1-4 units tend to be priced at a premium compared to MFR (MFR starts at 5 units).

So, depending on your ability to fund a deal, you might want to start with a MFR or you might find a 1-4 unit property lines up better fo a first purchase. Your access to credit, your cash and if there is any seller financing can tip things one way or the other.

Post: Is it smart to have your first investment be an apartment?

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Jasmine Hu:

I would say go ahead with 4 plex. It is a waste of time to test water with SFH then go multi. It doesn't help that much my opinion.

And technically, a 4plex is still a residential property so not MFR. 5 units and above for MFR. Why? Because you can not obtain owner occupied financing at 5 or more units. Only commercial financing then.

Build a team if you need a track record and you do not personally have it. Then you can say the team or the company has X years of collective experience.

As others have pointed out, skip any BS or excessive spin. Be honest. Focus on what you can back up. If you are a newbie, it will show really early. Telling them you are experienced when you are not will be quickly discovered. At that point you are branded as a fool or worse. Everybody, including the broker, was a newbie at some point in the past.

Post: Sponsor skin in the game or experience

John CoreyPosted
  • London
  • Posts 722
  • Votes 386
Originally posted by @Kent Ritter:

@Ben Leybovich Thanks for asking!

First - I want to thank everyone for their thoughtful responses. I've received a ton of value from you all. @Brian Burke, @Brian Briscoe, @Alina Trigub, @Danny Randazzo, @Taylor L., @Ola Dantis, @Roni E., @Michael Ealy, @Michael Le, @John Fortes,

To sum it up, you want a sponsor who: 

  1. Has a track record to know how to manage people and complex processes
  2. Has the character and is incentivized to do the right thing
  3. Has the financial means to not enter into bad deals just because they need the acquisition fee and to keep the deal afloat during bad times.

Track record is critical – But # of deals is only one metric, and if all of those deals have been done in the past 2 years with no exit, then that might only tell you that the sponsor can offer the highest price.

I think investors need to look at other sources of track record, such as other relevant business experience. We are, at the end of the day, buying cash-flowing businesses.

Has the sponsor successfully run another business, managed people, managed a budget, managed change, and provided positive returns?

Character – I didn’t originally include, but as @Tj Hines brought up - This is the MOST important! This is where the investor should spend time getting to know the sponsor. Do you believe the sponsor feels a moral obligation to do what is right?

What is their WHY? Does he/she have a calling beyond making the most money? Maybe ask for references.

Skin in the game – Alignment of interests is critical. People only do what they are incentivized to do. The best way to make sure the sponsor will act in your best interest is to make sure they are incentivized to do so.


Thanks All!

Kent


I loved how you summarised the thread. Well done and good luck.