Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Devin Bobulski
  • Madison, WI
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Risks by second lien when first lien has foreclosed on home

Devin Bobulski
  • Madison, WI
Posted

Thanks in advance for the advice.

There's a home that is close to my primary residence in Wisconsin where Wells Fargo has foreclosed on the first lien. The sheriff's sale has been delayed over the past 6 months and looks to go this week. I had a title firm run a search and found that Quicken has the second lien and has filed paperwork to foreclose 3 months after Wells Fargo completed their foreclosure. My understanding is that the second lien has no bearing after the sheriff's sale. They will get any money that is made above what Wells Fargo recovers on the sale. Is this correct and is there anything else to watch for? The property is vacant and winterized so the odds are the house will be a great rental for BRRRR strategy.

  • Devin Bobulski
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    391
    Posts
    246
    Votes
    Jeff Cichocki
    • Lender
    • Wisconsin
    246
    Votes |
    391
    Posts
    Jeff Cichocki
    • Lender
    • Wisconsin
    Replied

    Unfortunately, the answer can vary by state. In Wisconsin, the best thing that the 2nd can do is file foreclosure prior to the first filing. While it's an unwritten rule, the first will rarely file if another lender behind them files. It's basically done as a lender courtesy. @Scott Schultz answer above does a good job of explaining what happens and what most of the variables in Wisconsin are. There's a lot of meat in his answer. if you didn't catch everything, you may want to reread it a couple of times.

    Excess funds in Wisconsin, typically end up in the county's hands because the homeowner has no idea that they can file for the excess prior to foreclosure. Once foreclosure happens, their proceeds are forfeit. Wisconsin is one of the worst states for homeowners regarding excess funds. Most other states reserve the funds for a period of time (some states hold indefinitely) and allow all lien holders to claim against the excess up to the amount they are owed. In those states, the homeowner also has a right to claim, but only after the lien holders have been paid first. If a homeowner attempts to claim those funds and the lien holders haven't claimed yet, most counties will reach out to lien holders to ask if they would like their portion prior to sending the funds back to the homeowner. Lien holders almost always make claims at that point.

    Loading replies...