I'm just starting out and recently posted a thread in regards to a licensee investor marketing another investor's (wholesaler) properties to your own buyer's list in attempt to collect an assignment fee/advertising/referral fee (however you see fit) from original wholesaler.
I got mixed responses on if this strategy is legal, ethical, etc...Mostly said that the licensee would just need to disclose his/her license at all times, or yes -- that it was indeed illegal, and one added that I was making this too difficult, and there was nothing wrong here.
I phoned my broker, and he didn't have a clue as to an answer, so I then called the state RE legal hotline, and tried to explain to the attorney this idea of marketing other wholesaler's properties to my own buyer's list to collect a pre-arranged fee from the original wholesaler. I immediately was discouraged by the attorney who was very short with me, probably because I used buzz words like referral "fees", marketing un-owned property...If I had a chance to re-explain the approach, maybe I could have found middle ground with him, where I don't collect a "fee", but instead am paid at closing.
To make a long story short, I took his advice and immediately eliminated that strategy from my business system (before it even took place)...
Oddly enough, I begin reading a book on wholesaling and the author highly recommends this strategy, which the author refers to as "PROFIT STACKING." I did my due diligence to make sure there wasn't a post on this topic in BP, and strangely I found nothing. Maybe some of you refer to this as something different. Do any of you practice this, and is this indeed legal even for a licensee?? It is to my further understanding that legally you can only send someone a gift of no more than $50 as a referral or marketing "fee". I'm trying to get to the bottom of this. Is this example legal because no fees are actually handed out, but merely disbursed by the title company at closing? And are title companies even willing to do this?
1. Investor #1 puts a home under contract with a seller for $40,000 ====>
2. Investor #1 calls and offers to sell you the contract for $43,000 ====>
3. Since you don't have any direct buyers you call Investor #2 and see if he has any
buyers that would like to buy a $65,000 home for $48,000=====>
4. Investor #2 calls his buyers list and has an interested buyer who is willing to pay
$51,000.=====>
5. After coming to an agreement with investor #1 about him paying you the
difference between the end sales price and his $43,000, you put him in touch with
investor #2 and his buyer.====>
6. Now investor #2 will take over the contract for $51,000 with investor #1====>
7. This leaves investor #1 a gross profit of $3,000, leaves you with a gross profit of
$5,000, and leaves investor #2 a gross profit of $3,000.
Thanks in advance,
JDK