Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Hal Cranmer

Hal Cranmer has started 59 posts and replied 142 times.

Post: Lamest excuses for late rent

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

This thread is hilarious. I don't have much to match these. I did have a girl tell me - "Why are you charging a late fee? I emailed you and told you I was going to be late!"

Post: Soros sees no bottom for world financial "collapse"

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Soros could never have done this if it was not for the British Government having a fiat currency. Gold would have prevented this. The British Government is more at fault than Soros.

Artificially setting interest rates ruins economies and causes business cycles.

Post: Soros sees no bottom for world financial "collapse"

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Matty,

Always good to have a fellow Misesian on my side. Yes - absolutely I am talking about a free market deflation with a currency backed by a hard asset such as gold. Every basic economics course talks about the difference between 'real' and 'nominal' prices. Well there would not be any 'nominal' prices if the free market was allowed to regulate the currency.

If a manufacturer had the price he could sell his good cut from $100 to $50 in a free market deflationary environment, then chances are that his raw material inputs would be falling too and he would maintain a profit margin. Remember also that if he now made a $25 profit instead of a $50 profit, then in a deflationary environment that $25 would buy as much as the $50 used to - so his purchasing power has remained the same.

However, if he is losing money selling at $50, that is the free market telling him that the consumer no longer values his stuff compared to the raw material inputs of his manufacturing process. In other words, the free market is guiding him to find a new line of product that will bring him a profit. It is stopping him from producing more than the market demands, thus freeing up resources for other products that are MORE in demand.

Profits and losses are not made by inflation or deflation. They are made by entrepreneurs finding ways to combine various factors of production (material, labor etc.) to produce a good that is worth more to consumers than the sum of it's parts. Entrepreneurs can make this calculation in a stable money environment.

If the prices fall with stable money, it probably means that the entrepreneur is having competition which is driving supply up. That's a good thing because it means the good is available to more people, the price goes down and wealth is created for consumers - which is the ultimate beneficiary of the free market. If the entrepreneur sees his profits go down enough, he will get out of the product line. Supply will even out with demand. We will not over-produce.

However, when the Fed steps in and creates money, the entrepreneur cannot make accurate predictions about the real demand for his product and the real price. He will believe that something is profitable (such as housing) when it is not because he is getting artificial signals (such as really low interest rates). So he will produce much more (housing anyone?) than there is real demand in the market. When the Fed stops inflating, like they did in 2005-2006, suddenly the entrepreneurs miscalculation is uncovered and they all cry boo-hoo about deflation. At this point the market is just trying to correct the errors caused by the Fed.

You need stable money (such as gold) to make good economic calculation. The strongest period of economic growth in America happened in the period after the Civil War until the 1900's in a completely natural deflationary environment with a currency backed by gold and very little Fed interference.

Sorry for this rant, but I get all lathered up about the Fed and the government ruining the free market. We are all taught that inflation is good and deflation is bad because the Feds live on debt. Inflation IS good for the Feds because they can pay back loans in inflated currency and stiff their creditors. They also get the money from the Fed first before prices go up and so make out on the deal. By the time the new money gets to you and me, it has depreciated in value, as has our savings.

If you guys are really big fans of inflation out there, don't worry. You're about to get what you ask for - good and hard!

Post: Soros sees no bottom for world financial "collapse"

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

I would agree with Richard's analysis on everything except for his statements about deflation. Deflation in a free market is a wonderful thing. Prices are going down because the supply of goods is going up and your money is growing. The problem is in our fractional reserve banking system. In this case, the deflation is just the inevitable result of Greenspan, Bernanke et al inflating like crazy. For more on deflation, see this - http://mises.org/article.aspx?Id=1241.

Post: I am very interested in overseas Real Estate Investing

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Donald,

You may want to check out the website

http://www.Internationalliving.com

I subscribe to their magazine as well - mostly for wishful thinking at this point. They cover real estate deals across the world.

Post: Price Reduction after Under Agreement?

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Don't give up. Remember that EVERYTHING is negotiable! Hopefully you have a financing and inspection 'out' clause in your PA. I just bought a duplex that I originally offered $103K on. Then I had an inspection that found some issues with the drainage and that one furnace had to be replaced. I sent an addendum in that I did not know of these problems prior to the inspection (I didn't) and that I would only buy the property if they took $6K off the price. They did and we had a sale.
In your case if they are already reducing the price on the MLS, I would think they would accept a lower offer. Your inspector will find SOMETHING that you did not know about. Tell the bank about it in an addendum and ask for a lower offer to pay for it. You shouldn't even need an estimate to prove it!

Post: Whats the best way to get an REO offer accepted?

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Glenn,

I just bought an REO that sold for $277 in 2006 and I got it for $97K. It's a duplex and I am renting it out for $2000/month after putting about $12K into it. It was a great deal. Comps are about $170-200K. I found that you should include in your offer the ability to close quickly - hopefully by the end of the month. That way the decisionmaker at the bank can get a commission for making his monthly quota. Also, I orginally offered $103K, then submitted a supplementary offer after the inspection. I said I found some problems (I did) that would cost about $5K and would like that off the purchase price. The bank agreed because they knew we were closing soon. Hope that helps!

Post: Did Anyone See This Coming?

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Matty,

Great to see another freak like me! I just want to bring up a website called

http://www.campaignforliberty.com

It's Ron Paul trying to organize grass roots folks to run for local offices and espouse a platform of free markets, and individual liberty - pretty radical ideas in these times!

Post: Should we keep our powder dry?

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

Sorry about that. Someone sent me the article. Here is the meat of it:

Statistics compiled by data aggregator RealtyTrac hint at the magnitude of the problem nationwide. RealtyTrac tracked foreclosure-related filings on 2.3 million U.S. properties in 2008, an 87 percent jump from the year before, with 861,664 homes making it through the entire process to become REOs.
The Mortgage Bankers Association's surveys of members suggest one out of 10 mortgages was either delinquent or in the foreclosure process at the end of September, and Moody's Economy.com estimates 12 million homeowners are "upside down" -- they owe more on their homes than their properties would fetch in today's market.

RealtyTrac senior vice president Rick Sharga told attendees at the Inman News Real Estate Connect conference in New York City this month that an analysis of 500,000 distressed properties in four states in the company's database found only about one in four were listed for sale in a multiple listing service, or MLS.

That suggests that as many as 75 percent of distressed properties have yet to hit the market, Sharga said, and that many of those homes will soon be putting pressure on inventory and prices as banks repossess them and put them up for sale. . . .

Joshua Olshin, president of New York, N.Y.-based Tranzon Integrated Property Group, said that the possibility that a wave of REO properties is about to enter the market creates uncertainty and puts downward pressure on prices.

"People see the foreclosure numbers, and that banks are not even selling what they have, and then we have a whole new load (of REOs) coming on, and that's causing people not to price things effectively and accurately," Olshin said. "It's kind of compounding the problem, I think." . . .

The government's TARP purchases of preferred shares gave some banks a thicker capital cushion -- if only fleetingly -- which regulators hoped they would use to make more loans. Instead, some banks have moved to acquire weaker competitors.

"Last summer, we began seeing banks be much more aggressive in the way they priced things," Olshin said. But banks may also not want to recognize losses that accompany the sale of properties at deep discounts when they are having difficulty raising the capital they need to meet statutory minimums, Olshin said. "To be frank, since the TARP money came in, they are still selling off (properties at auction), but they kind of took a step back." . . .

Real Estate Disposition LLC (REDC), which claims to be the nation's largest real estate auction company, held 300 ballroom auctions in 2008 and sold nearly 33,000 foreclosed homes for $3.4 billion -- a seven-fold increase in sales volume and nearly triple the proceeds the company generated in 2007.

Company CEO Jeffrey Frieden said he expects to "smash that record" this year as banks and lenders continue to amass a huge inventory of foreclosed homes and are more motivated than ever to sell their inventory. . . .

Some observers fear that if the massive amount of debt the government is taking on to stimulate a recovery, inflation -- and higher interest rates -- are inevitable consequences. Inflation can spur home sales because households are looking for an inflation-proof place to park their assets.

But rising interest rates can also reduce consumer's home-buying power, undermining prices. If interest rates shoot up, buyers who close a deal on a home with a subsidized mortgage could see the value of their homes plummet when subsidies end and interest rates shoot up. . . .

"It's almost like a tsunami -- you can see it coming and you know it's going to hit but you cant get out of the way," said Ann Stickel, vice president of affiliated services with Sarasota, Fla.-based brokerage Michael Saunders and Co.

Post: Should we keep our powder dry?

Hal CranmerPosted
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lakeville, MN
  • Posts 153
  • Votes 17

It looks like it may be worth holding off on buying any more real estate. Check out what's coming in this article:

http://www.inman.com/news/2009/01/26/banks-unleash-flood-reos

Any thoughts?