Originally posted by @Dustin Ruff:
@Matthew Paul Affordable is not difficult to figure out. Especially if you’re really doing your research on your market neighborhoods. You know the demographics. You know the median income. You know the businesses and jobs available. You know all kinds of information that can tell you what’s affordable.
Let’s not pretend that we don’t know what affordable for a neighborhood. To not know or to disregard it is either going to be detrimental to your investments or is purely greedy selfishness.
I would assume you are you saying 25% or 30% of income in C or B areas? Then, do the reverse math at current market price, property taxes, maintenance, renovation cost, etc., and see what a building "should" cost. Then, evaluate the risk and define an "affordable" ROI. It's funny how easy is to blame the landlord for charging more after spending more.
Without improvements, many areas will remain stagnant and deteriorate.
What's affordable is not easy to define. It is a very valid question. Is it what people would like to pay for a 2/1, what they can afford, or what it actually costs to provide it with a decent return on the risk taken?
If 35% to 50% of income vs. rent is not "affordable", there are a few options, they could make more money, reduce expenses, get roommates, or move.
What role do you expect landlords should have? Negative returns?