@Samuel S.
You can definitely keep the POHs and have a "flat apartment" as it's sometimes referred to! ^^
The reason why most people avoid POHs:
- The time / pain of managing the MH (ie. the whole "don't want to fix toilets").
- The spread between the home rent and lot rent might not be enough to cover R&M of the MH - it's a 'ghost stream of income' then in the end, when you factor in time, expenses, etc, comes out close to $0 NOI.
- Generally, if the tenants own the home than there's a higher pride of ownership.
So if you can overcome those management issues and also control costs so that the MH can bring you money, then keeping the MH as rentals can make sense. Others in rent control states, might keep them b/c the lot rents have rent control on them, but there's no rent control on what you charge on the MH portion.
However, from a financial perspective, lenders will not allow you to cap the MH portion of the rent. So when you tell the lender you have $400 rents / month, they'll ask - but what's the lot rent portion? And what are the expenses associated with the lot rent? They'll want to see it separated out. If you tell them it's all rentals, they'll want you to provide some type of local market lot rent comps to set a value. The same will go for appraiser and future buyers. Also for larger deals, to qualify for agency debt, there might be requirements about the % of MH. Before it was 20%.. now that standard has loosened. CMBS was much more accommodating but for now that type of debt has gone bye bye.
Also from a property tax perspective, you'd want to present the case to the assessor that your park's value is based on the lot rent and not all of the rent. That can help keep your property values lower. You'll be paying MH taxes (ie decal taxes) separately, so no use in getting double-taxed. So if you're purchase price is $300,000, then dividing that out some way so that land portion and home portion is separated out.
Generally valuation metrics work like this:
Annual NOI from the Lot Rent / Cap Rate = Park Price
POH valuation theories:
* NADA value x a discount rate
* Gross Rent Multiplier: Total Annual Income x (usually between 1-3)
* Annual NOI from the POH portion of the rent / Cap Rate (typically starting around 15%)
I'm talking in generalities some of which might not apply to your particular purchase. Every deal has its own nuances - these are just some nuances to be aware of.
We almost lost a deal going back and forth over how to value the POHs vs the Land (allocations). Both sides were operating under what turned out to be some incorrect assumptions about tax liability - both for the Seller and for the Buyer. In the end, we decided the deal was good enough and we went with the Seller's allocations and the deal closed.
So in the end, what works may differ then what's the norm.