Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Pete M.

Pete M. has started 32 posts and replied 235 times.

Post: Whole Life Insurance as a Foundation for Real Estate Investing

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

There's no significant difference in the time-value of money in this situation, though.  You put money into the policy, and it's generally available very quickly to borrow back out.  It's not like you pay into it for X number of years, and then it becomes available; you have access to the ACV the whole time while it's growing.  Even if the returns were only 2.83% (which is low), that wouldn't be instead of gains you can get through real estate investing.  You can do both!  That's why I say it's like making $1 do the job of $2. 

Post: Whole Life Insurance as a Foundation for Real Estate Investing

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141
Originally posted by @Cliff H.:

@John Perrings So you’re saying the high surrender rates on WLI are not true? That data appears to be tracked and are pretty terrible. Why would I choose to invest in (and strategically have to overfund at the start) a policy that, if lapsed negates the strategy of using it in the first place? What could I do with that money if I bought term at 1/10 the cost and still got 7-10% return in other markets?

 Whether the surrender rates are high or not is irrelevant.  All that says is that the policyholders stopped paying and terminated their policies.  It's not like the underlying policy crashed or went bankrupt--the risk is in the policyholder not following through, not the policy itself.  The advantage is that for the same dollar, I can get both whole life insurance and use those same dollars for real estate investing.  It's not either/or.

Post: Duplex property in Kansas City?

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

If you're already buying in the market and can find a duplex for the right price, there's no reason to not move on it.  Just expect less inventory vs SFRs.

Post: Whole Life Insurance as a Foundation for Real Estate Investing

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141
Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:


And this is not even taking into account that it takes years for the cash value of your policy to match the money that you put in. If a 2.83% return AFTER TEN YEARS, which is basically a negative return if you account for inflation, is something that's appealing to you....then by all means...go for the WL policy. 

2.83% seems a little bit low. But how could you consider that a negative return, when that money at the same time is also invested outside of the policy. The interest that you get from the policy, while not very high I agree, is in addition to what you are making outside with the same money.

The whole concept of this strategy is that your cash value is still growing at its full value while you are at the same time taking a loan secured by it to reinvest outside the policy. You are making your money work at two places at the same time.

The only downside is that for the first few year you can only reinvest approximately 75% of your cash outside of the policy. So it takes a few years to catch up. After that, your total return is way higher than if you had invested directly in an outside investment. And on top of it you have a life insurance.

Now if you are telling me that you use a permanent life insurance policy just to keep money in it without using it, then yes, it is lousy investment, a little bit better than bonds, but with also in most state asset protection. So if you want to compare bonds to real estate investment, I believe that on this forum everyone will agree that the later is much better. But what would be better: real estate investment only, or the same real estate investment with some additional % of tax free return on top of it?

Bingo, you nailed it on the head.  If you're trying to compare the return on the WL policy vs other strategies, then yes, it will look terrible.  But that's not the point.  It's a long-term strategy to basically make $1 do the job of $2--you get life insurance (not tied to your employment) AND you can still use those same dollars towards RE investing.  The problem is you do have to fund it heavily to get it there, so it can be a struggle for those without a lot of capital available.

Post: Whole Life Insurance as a Foundation for Real Estate Investing

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

Check out "Heads I Win, Tails You Lose" by Patrick Donohue, or the infinite banking series by R Nelson Nash.

We use a LOC collaterized against the actual cash value of the policies for my wife and myself. Since a WL policy is generally very safe, the LOC LTV will be high. We use a separate LOC since the interest rate is lower than if we borrowed directly out of the policy.

Keep in mind you can only put in so much each year, based on your income and other variables, so can take time to build up. You can have multiple policies on the same person. I even have a $250k policy on my 2yr old son! There are costs to set it up and less of the initial money goes to the ACV, but still worth it.

WL policies mean I can have death benefit coverage while still using most of that money for other things, like RE investing, and it's not tied to my W2 job.

Post: MFR valuation & financing Qs

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

@John LaBanca  Great info, appreciated.  Totally agree on the financing, though we're talking to portfolio lenders with local banks vs traditional conventional loans.  Either way, the rates are less than half of what hard money is at right now, and the loan period is longer.  And yes, definitely making sure there's no prepayment penalty.  Good idea on the supplemental loan option.  I've been upfront with the lenders on our plan to reposition and refi, so they can help position the right loan option.

Also appreciate the correction on the quick rule-of-thumb valuation.  Besides checking with local agents, do you have a trusted source for cap rates?

Post: MFR valuation & financing Qs

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

@Dallon Schultz  Appreciate the input.  I have brought in a partner, both for splitting equity and responsibilities, but also found some local lenders that will fund the rehab in addition to the purchase.

Re: the valuation, sounds like what I'm hearing as well.  Income determines value, but they can sanity check that with comps if available.  We're paying a commercial appraiser to do a quick estimation, nothing formal, to get an idea of what we think it'll be worth at the end of the day.

Post: Branson , MO, STR Strategy

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

Timely topic, as I was considering new markets for STRs.  Used to live in MO, too.

Are you all working with a local agent to find the properties, or are you typically picking them up on market?  What kind of seasonality do you see there?  What's a realistic expectation on returns?

Post: Lenders in Kansas City

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

Re-re-zombifying this thread since things are changing quickly!  Who's using who for commercial loans, and what terms are you seeing?  Found an 8-unit that may be a good fit, so now on the hunt for financing.  

DM me your contacts, too!

Post: MFR valuation & financing Qs

Pete M.Posted
  • Financial Advisor
  • Issaquah, WA
  • Posts 241
  • Votes 141

All,

Looking at my first foray into commercial multifamily (previously done SFR & small multi BRRRRs). We've looking to essentially do the same (BRRRR), just on a bigger scale. How are you structuring your financing to do initial purchase plus rehab? I have hard money lenders who will loan for purchase + rehab, but rates are high enough that they'd basically be a non-starter for a 12-18 mo repositioning. Cheaper rates can be had through conventional loans, but those won't fund rehab, and many lenders won't do second position loans. Should I just look for a local lender who will do purchase + rehab in one, or what am I missing?

On valuation, how would you assume valuation is done for an 8-unit that's comprised of two duplexes and a quad on a single parcel? Strictly based on income-approach (NOI divided by cap, minus major deferred items), or are comps also looked at?

What's your rule of thumb methodology for a quick valuation?  I've heard take annualized rent, subtract 50% for expenses and vacancy, and then divide by going cap rate.  Obviously this would be a quick-and-dirty estimation, not to be confused with gathering the T-12s to establish a true as-is.

Thanks.