i mistakenly assumed my buyers agent would, due to fiduciary responsibility, protect me and make sure all bases were covered since i was too busy trying to meet the 1031 exchange deadline...i unquestioningly trusted his instructions ...big mistake!..
Question:after reading the BP posts , i belatedly reviewed the OH purchase contract and saw that it specified Earnest Money Deposit was to be kept with Buyers Broker,not with the Sellers Broker....so why are funds wired to the Sellers Broker?What is the justification for that..or is it just a common practice, despite the wording of the contract?It is clearly detrimental to the Buyers. The Sellers Broker has no right to the EMD per OH Purchase contract, and I pointed that out to the Sellers Broker by email....but I guess since I carelessly approved the wiring of funds to him as directed by my Buyers Agent...that overrides the wording of the contract?I pointed out to the Sellers Broker that per contract, a Buyer has the option to terminate within a specified time if they are not happy with the condition of the property and give proof of this ...we did through photos of exterior damage and comments by the inspector who wisely decided against proceeding with the inspection knowing the undisclosed (in the MLS) swimming pool was non negotiable with me. I told the broker that had the swimming pool been disclosed I would not even have sent the inspector there since it does not meet my criteria of a basic no-frills invstment home.
I mentioned to the Sellers Broker that nowhere in the contract does it state that the Buyer is required to allow Seller to fix the damages regardless of Buyer's deadlines and 1031 Exch situation. Seller refused to return earnest money deposit claiming she was not given a chance to correct the multiple errors on the home. Per the OH contract, Buyer is given an option to terminate, following the rules, which I did. Seller signed the contract agreeing to that.
The EMD portion in the OH contract stated an EMD amount should be specified or the EMD provision does not apply (it was not and therefore the EMD clause is invalid); also it states this clause should be initialed by the Buyer (it was not), further invalidating the EMD provision. I shudder at my carelessness in fully trusting my Buyers Agent and not being more careful in reading the contract, which was made more difficult since it was electronic and not as easy to read as a hard copy contract and we were very short on time. (But no excuses for that ).
Hopefully the Sellers Broker will cooperate. If not, what are my best options?Thanks.