Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
House Hacking
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts

Do I need to make sure that a deal is under 1% & 50% rules?

Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Posted

Hi folks, I am trying to buy a quadplex to house hack for my family. We are planning to occupy there for 1 ~ 2 years and looking for cash flow after we leave. So my plan is to get experience on managing property & maintaining tenants. And right now, I am looking at a deal that looks promising but number isn't that great but also not that bad. But it seems the deals is a little out of 1% & 50% rule. Here is the exact number. 

Property ask price: $486k but rent income is $4800($1200/unit). My mortgage will be $2600+(7.3% rate) so expenses can be $2200 at max as 45%. These numbers are not a house hacking scenario but to check if the deal is good so that I can start house hacking. In short, the deal has < 1% rule for rent to asking price and 50% can't be spent as expenses. I also feel this looks not great because of 7.3% interest rate but also I made it so conservative since I didn't take vacancy rate into account. 


- I am aware that possibly I need to negotiate the asking to 480k to match 1% rule but also not sure if that's convincing enough.  

User Stats

14,195
Posts
10,896
Votes
Theresa Harris
Pro Member
#2 Managing Your Property Contributor
10,896
Votes |
14,195
Posts
Theresa Harris
Pro Member
#2 Managing Your Property Contributor
Replied

Don't worry about 'rules' as they are guidelines some people use to get a quick idea if the property works.  You need to look at the expenses (mortgage, insurance, property taxes, etc) and income.  If you are living in one of the four units, run the numbers as if you were renting all 4 units.  Ideally the rent from the other three units will cover most of your living expenses (ie 'rent') for your own unit while you are living there. If you are planning on buying it with a smaller down payment, that will also increase your mortgage costs as you are borrowing more and also need mortgage insurance.

The price of the home (from the seller's perspective) is based on market value and condition, not on whether or not it matches the 1% rule.   Talk to your realtor about what a realistic price is for the home.

User Stats

621
Posts
347
Votes
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
347
Votes |
621
Posts
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

Dave Meyer- from bigger pockets wrote and interesting blog a few years ago about the 1% rule being deal. https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

It's pretty fascinating. Such a reminder that these rules are not the standard for investing. As @theresaharris mentioned these are just guidelines. I'm from Sugar Land but now live in Chicago. I'd say if you find inventory to buy in Houston that is close to these guidelines, I'd go for it. Houston isn't making 4 unit buildings regularly. It should appreciate...depending on your area. Definitely ask your realtor about appreciation in the area you're looking to purchase. 

 Best of luck! 

BiggerPockets logo
Time to Refi? Get the Best Loan
|
BiggerPockets
Lender Finder helps secure the best loan for your strategy. Easily connect with top investor-friendly lenders now to lock in lowered rates. 🔒

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Theresa Harris:

Don't worry about 'rules' as they are guidelines some people use to get a quick idea if the property works.  You need to look at the expenses (mortgage, insurance, property taxes, etc) and income.  If you are living in one of the four units, run the numbers as if you were renting all 4 units.  Ideally the rent from the other three units will cover most of your living expenses (ie 'rent') for your own unit while you are living there. If you are planning on buying it with a smaller down payment, that will also increase your mortgage costs as you are borrowing more and also need mortgage insurance.

The price of the home (from the seller's perspective) is based on market value and condition, not on whether or not it matches the 1% rule.   Talk to your realtor about what a realistic price is for the home.

Thanks for the reply. 


I think the main problem is to figure out if the property works as a first time house hacker/ investor. I ran number multiple times but my estimation seems not great as I am not sure what percentage I should allocate monthly expenses as the recommandation is a range such as 5%~15%. With my number, the property gives cashflow of $200-300 without me occupying there. If we stay, we are staying in with $500-$800/m which is cheaper than other renters but not so great as I was expecting living 'free' or $100-$200/m. However, I am also aware if the interest rate gets a little down to 5%-6%, the number should have been better than this.   

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Dave Meyer- from bigger pockets wrote and interesting blog a few years ago about the 1% rule being deal. https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

It's pretty fascinating. Such a reminder that these rules are not the standard for investing. As @theresaharris mentioned these are just guidelines. I'm from Sugar Land but now live in Chicago. I'd say if you find inventory to buy in Houston that is close to these guidelines, I'd go for it. Houston isn't making 4 unit buildings regularly. It should appreciate...depending on your area. Definitely ask your realtor about appreciation in the area you're looking to purchase. 

 Best of luck! 


 Thanks @Sarita. I do remember the posting as you mentioned in my another thread. By reading the article makes sense also I can understand the motivation of the article as it was in 2021 when things were crazy. It is good to remind other benefits of having a property. Do you think still 1% doesn't work in many places as we are in 2024? 

User Stats

621
Posts
347
Votes
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
347
Votes |
621
Posts
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Dave Meyer- from bigger pockets wrote and interesting blog a few years ago about the 1% rule being deal. https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

It's pretty fascinating. Such a reminder that these rules are not the standard for investing. As @theresaharris mentioned these are just guidelines. I'm from Sugar Land but now live in Chicago. I'd say if you find inventory to buy in Houston that is close to these guidelines, I'd go for it. Houston isn't making 4 unit buildings regularly. It should appreciate...depending on your area. Definitely ask your realtor about appreciation in the area you're looking to purchase. 

 Best of luck! 


 Thanks @Sarita. I do remember the posting as you mentioned in my another thread. By reading the article makes sense also I can understand the motivation of the article as it was in 2021 when things were crazy. It is good to remind other benefits of having a property. Do you think still 1% doesn't work in many places as we are in 2024? 


 Yes. It's harder to find. Especially in a house hack. I love this article because it really highlights how the rule came about. Most of these books on investing are already out dated by the time they publish. Buyers are reading concepts on investing that we haven't seen in years or decades like in Rich Dad Poor Dad. 

I constantly preach about attending meetups, staying active on blogs and following local investors on instagram. It's a great way to keep up with the market on a real time basis. 

User Stats

143
Posts
142
Votes
Anthony Swain
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Charlotte, NC
142
Votes |
143
Posts
Anthony Swain
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Charlotte, NC
Replied

@Jaekwan Lee

Hey! Welcome to the forums!

Fellow house hacker here. It sounds like you have a good situation being able to house hack with your significant other in a quadplex. You'll get to split your unit's rent with another person too ;)

I think you're in a better position than other investors. YOU can live in the investment property. You will benefit from low-down payment options (3.5-5%), possibly reduced living expenses, appreciation, and loan pay-down. Not to mention, you'll gain valuable experience in property management, renovations, project management, etc. 

Also, would you consider doing a furnished rental for one or more of the units? This strategy can increase your income while you are house-hacking. This strategy has worked tremendously for us, but I'm not sure of demand or rates relative to your area.

Keep running your numbers, but don't get stuck in analysis paralysis. Eventually, you will need to leap into your 1st investment. If your numbers check out and the deal makes sense, then trust your process. 

Good luck! I'm happy to help if you have any questions. 

User Stats

1,463
Posts
805
Votes
Adam Bartomeo
Property Manager
Pro Member
#2 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cape Coral, FL
805
Votes |
1,463
Posts
Adam Bartomeo
Property Manager
Pro Member
#2 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cape Coral, FL
Replied

The 1% rule actually used to be the 2%. Over time the 2% rule became unachievable and it was changed to the 1%. Currently, in my area you are lucky to find anything that meets the 1% rule. There are many metrics that should be taken into account when purchasing. Use them as guides in decision making not hard and fat rules.

User Stats

3,854
Posts
2,188
Votes
Michael Smythe
Property Manager
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
2,188
Votes |
3,854
Posts
Michael Smythe
Property Manager
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
Replied

@Jaekwan Lee what price do you have to offer so rent covers your mortgage, property taxes, insurance and other expenses?

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Michael Smythe:

@Jaekwan Lee what price do you have to offer so rent covers your mortgage, property taxes, insurance and other expenses?

I think that's my problem. I am not sure what price is good to go as a first time buyer and house hacker. The most tricky part is realistic other expenses. If I make the other exponses too conservative, no deals are good enough to purchase whereas not being conservative makes me scare as I don't know what the realities are.

How do I get the expense most realistic? The below was something I was using but not sure if this is conversative or not.

- Maintenance & Repair: 5% of total rent
- Cap ex / utilities: 5% of total rent
- Property management: 8~10% of total rent
- Misc & reserve: 5% of total rent

Full rent: 4800(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 1150(Expense) = $250/m
Owner occupied: 3600(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 1150(Expense) = -$950/m
Owner occupied & no PM: 3600(rent) - 2600(PI) - 800(TI) - 700(Expense) = -$400/m


I thought it would be $0/m if owner occupied although $400/m for myfamily is low enough.

To cover entire expense, the only thing that can be reduced is PI and should be $2200(PI) and if I do reverse calculate, the house price should be $410k. This seems unrealistic.

User Stats

3,854
Posts
2,188
Votes
Michael Smythe
Property Manager
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
2,188
Votes |
3,854
Posts
Michael Smythe
Property Manager
  • Property Manager
  • Metro Detroit
Replied

If you are living there, you should be able to figure out how to manage it yourself.

Also, why are you looking to live for free?

Appears each unit will rent for $1200, so find some middle ground on the cashflow -$400 up to -$1200 to make a realistic offer.

User Stats

3,954
Posts
2,109
Votes
Wale Lawal
Agent
#5 New Member Introductions Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Houston | Dallas | Austin, TX
2,109
Votes |
3,954
Posts
Wale Lawal
Agent
#5 New Member Introductions Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Houston | Dallas | Austin, TX
Replied

@Jaekwan Lee

The rent-to-price ratio and expense ratio are critical factors in property evaluation. The monthly rent is less than 1%, while expenses account for 50% of the rent. A negative cash flow indicates a possible down payment. Negotiating the price and considering expenses, such as vacancy and maintenance, are critical to identifying if the quadplex is a viable investment.

Good luck!

User Stats

1,183
Posts
660
Votes
Jay Thomas
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
660
Votes |
1,183
Posts
Jay Thomas
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
Replied

The 1% and 50% rules are guidelines, not absolutes, especially with high interest rates. Prioritize cash flow after expenses, vacancies, and management costs.Your numbers show potential positive cash flow, but the 7.3% interest rate affects returns.

BiggerPockets logo
PassivePockets is here!
|
BiggerPockets
Find sponsors, evaluate deals, and learn how to invest with confidence.