Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tenant Screening
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago, 04/06/2021

User Stats

88
Posts
49
Votes
Kat Rathell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Milwaukee, WI
49
Votes |
88
Posts

Eployment verification third parties

Kat Rathell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Milwaukee, WI
Posted

We recently started running into more employers using the Worknumber or Truework or other employment verification services. Our rentals are in the inner city of Milwaukee, WI, so our renters are low income.

The services charge $50 for verifications, and it is a lot for our prospective tenants. We don’t charge an application fee, and only charge $25 for a background check if we have confirmed their rental history and employment and want to move ahead and offer the unit to the applicant. Yes, it is a lot of work, but we are a small business and want to be fair to our applicants, and not charge them until there is reason to.

We do not ever call the number of the ‘supervisor’ listed on the application, we go straight to HR, and caught a ton of fake employment records that way. But I feel that our low income tenants are at a disadvantage with this new trend, considering how they have to pay to prove they are employed to qualify for an apartment.

Any thoughts or workarounds?

Thanks!

Loading replies...