Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

67
Posts
25
Votes
Dave Blackman
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Santa Barbara, CA
25
Votes |
67
Posts

JV deals - do you put both entities on the deed and/or title?

Dave Blackman
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Santa Barbara, CA
Posted

Good afternoon all,

Taking a quick census here for all the JV veterans as to whether you put both your entity and your JV's entity on (as say, 50/50 ownership):

a) Note deed itself

b) Property title if you take the property back (through foreclosure/deed in lieu, etc)

I've seen both, as there appears to be some confusion as to the best way to avoid IRS taxing the JV as a partnership. Do you issue a K-1 to your partner or a 1099 at year end?

Assume anyone offering JV's has consulted with their CPA's and Tax Attorneys -- and I realize that most of you are not those yourselves -- just looking to see if there's a consensus, with the caveat that it may differ somewhat state to state (I'm in California). Maybe @Brandon Hall has some thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

110
Posts
251
Votes
Adam Adams
  • Investor
  • Small Town, TX
251
Votes |
110
Posts
Adam Adams
  • Investor
  • Small Town, TX
Replied

From my CPA, JVs do not require 1099. However, you want to be able to show money leaving the company and the best way to do that is to issue 1099. Otherwise it could create a red flag for the IRS to check out your books. So we do issue 1099s when there are distributions. For expenses, we provide a balance sheet as the JV gets to realize the expenses when they provide workout funds.

At AJA, we do not put the JV on any part of the chain of title. Our view is that this is a Lead / Passive relationship and putting the passive on the deed or assignment puts that passive partner in a decision making role. While we always consult with our partners while making the big decisions on what to do with the assets, we still maintain the decision making role in the JV. As far as proof of equity, our JV agreements creates a 50/50 equity split in the asset, so the need to put the JV on the title is not needed.

Loading replies...