Innovative Strategies
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated 9 months ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ee4f/9ee4f91fa7ac82c262243271ce57f96114e64606" alt="Don Konipol's profile image"
- Lender
- The Woodlands, TX
- 8,853
- Votes |
- 5,711
- Posts
Why I Believe Striving to Build Passive Income is Overrated
Why I Believe Striving to Build Passive Income is Overrated
This may seem like a disingenuous statement coming from a passive income guy, BUT, I believe that those looking to build sustainable look term wealth would be better off to downplay passive income.
Passive income has a role, a large role, but one best utilized when a certain level of wealth has been achieved, and the holder of said wealth is looking to preserve capital and live off the income generated by passive investments.
I hear many relatively new real estate investors say that their goal is to acquire enough real property to replace their earned (W-2 or 1099 or Sch C) income with the income be generated by their investments. The problem with this is that they tend to place INCOME as the main feature of any investment they’re currently considering, and their decision making process centers around how a particular investment will fit into their ULTIMATE portfolio, the one that is large enough to generate all that income which will replace their earnings, and still grow enough to offset inflation.
In my opinion, what the investor in this situation should be doing is concentrating on WEALTH BUILDING, not passive income. The investments should be chosen based on increased wealth, so that an investment in land, providing no income, but likely to triple in value in 24 months, would be chosen over a office building throwing off 12% income, but unlikely to increase in value. Both these investments may be good; but for the “wealth accumulation” stage the land that triples in value is clearly the better choice. (This is obviously a simplification; one must consider risk, personal comfort, ability to manage, etc.).
The wealth builder should always consider selling or trading his property for a property that will increase his net worth FASTER. Investors tend to fall in love with certain properties they own, and stick with them even if something better comes along. The wealth builder should be agnostic about property; the BEST investment is the one that brings them closer to their wealth building goal the fastest.
Now, somewhere along the path to wealth accumulation, it may be proper for the wealth builder to place a portion of their assets in passive investments throwing off significant income, if only for portfolio diversification. And we need to distinguish between passive income investments and passive investment that strive for capital gains and or increasing value. So for the wealth builder, a projected 20% return on a passive equity investment is better than a 10% income return on a passive debt investment.
Here’s my bias in general terms. First $50k of investment capital should go into a money market fund or similar. Next $500k should go into real estate equities, active or passive. Next $1 million split between income and equity. After that it becomes very personal depending on investors goals, abilities, interests, etc.
What do you think?
- Don Konipol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52644/5264456e9e235a4fb4fa7309a9c80e0ad94c2eaf" alt="business profile image"
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d29/b6d29ffaa3a3a4a749afdf8f537d38d0eece780a" alt="Jay Hinrichs's profile image"
- Lender
- Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
- 62,978
- Votes |
- 42,743
- Posts
Agree the idea that one can live off of rental income long term is nice but not too common.
to me passive income is a place holder to allow you to control the property while is goes up in value over time and once that happens then decide if its a keep or roll into something else.
So to me you either make transactional income in the RE bizz while you grow your passive portfolio or you keep your chosen career while you grow your passive portfolio.
The idea that Hey I get to 10k a month and I am quitting and will live the rest of my life on this money to me is not a long term strategy that will play out.. over 20 to 30 years 10k a month is not going to cut it.. it seems to me those who think it will are younger and have had jobs that maybe pay 80 to 100k a year so they are just replacing those.. And most folks dont truly understand what its really like being Self employed. Then of course depends on your lifestyle and where you actually live some places are much more expensive to live than others..
I have spent the last 24 years helping folks build their rental portfolios doing BRRR deal for them and everyone of them still needs some transactional income so they don't rob their rental portfolio those that tried to live on rents alone end up struggling. Of course there are those that are very good with money and live very frugal lifestyles that can pull it off. But folks tend to spend more as time goes on then you have inflation and your rent income does not grow as fast.
- Jay Hinrichs
- Podcast Guest on Show #222
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6810/a68101b88dfc15c23403a219c684fbdb4d886d6e" alt="business profile image"